Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

Martian Flyer

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
Chrontius Chrontius's picture
Martian Flyer
I'm working on a Martian flyer, a biomorph answer to the Ripwing. As Gatecrashing points out that Synergy's Rocs can fly under Martian conditions, these guys should have an easy time at present, and as terraforming continues, an ever easier time - and, as Firewall might care about, easier still on Earth, with its thick ol' radioactive atmosphere. They're being developed by a pissed-off MIT adjunct professor with an axe to grind, and a Firewall operative in the lab across the hall. Shi's adopted (along with a new gender identity of 'hermaphrodite') a "when it's ready" stance toward release, and I'm leaning toward a Barsoomian-friendly, open-source sort of release in protest of the shitty rusters and alpiners with planned obsolescence baked in. For the record, they're more Ripwing than Lunar Flyer. Their nickname, once recognized as a unique morph, is the "red dragon" morph, though pedants would point out that they're actually wyverns. They've also been in the works since about a year before the Fall, intended as an idealized Martian morph, potentially extensible to Venus after a couple more decades' terraforming, operating on the principe that Martians should be appreciably alien, and the 50/500 rule needs to be respected (hence, by default, all of them are fertile hermaphrodites). What sort of things should I take into account? Stats and transcript to follow. I feel like this would make a good entry in the Farcast yearblog, but I missed the cutoff.
Undocking Undocking's picture
On Mars, even for Eclipse
On Mars, even for Eclipse Phase, VTOL craft are much for efficient and plausible. The 30% less gravity is nice but the extremely thin atmosphere, even this far into terraforming, would pose an issue. Gatecrashing does mention that srocs can fly there, but it is 'only just'. Keep in mind that this morph would have to be quite large with a huge wingspan--while still being light. Not very effective for some sentinel work.
Chrontius Chrontius's picture
Srocs - unavoidably - have a
Srocs - unavoidably - have a considerably lousier wing-loading to body-mass ratio than the things I'm imagining, I took that as confirmation that the concept was workable. Since I've got some time today, I think I'll transcribe the stats and fluff.
Chrontius Chrontius's picture
The Dragon's Draft
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xumcPBEcQsztIDLnXmX8Cm5Ot3-jgDTtofax... This is intended as an early draft for discussion, and grew out of a game that almost was. In the name of full disclosure, most of my assumptions are based on an old SciFi.com blog called Lab Notes, and were rechecked against more college anatomy and physiology classes than I care to admit to. [url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5_UjlP8kvx-SUxWaGFYQVE0R1U/edit?usp=sh... Lab Notes page is archived here;[/url] I grabbed it just before an announced site redesign pulled it offline forever. Also relevant to this morph is [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294556]"The Morphological Basis of the Arm-To-Wing Transition"[/url] by Samuel O. Poore, MD, PhD, published in the Febuary 2008 edition of the Journal of Hand Surgery. [url=https://hplusbiopolitics.wordpress.com/tag/flight/]Read a writeup here, if you don't want to read the whole paper,[/url] but if you can get journal access, I highly recommend it.
Chrontius Chrontius's picture
A quick follow-up
[b]Poore, S.O. The morphological basis of the arm-to-wing transition. J. Hand Surg. 33: 277-280.[/b]
S.O. Poore wrote:
[b]Abstract:[/b] "Human-powered flight has fascinated scientists, artists, and physicians for centuries. This history includes Abbas Ibn Firnas, a Spanish inventor who attempted the first well-documented human flight; Leonardo da Vinci and his flying machines; the Turkish inventor Hezarfen Ahmed Celebi; and the modern aeronautical pioneer Otto Lilienthal. These historic figures held in common their attempts to construct wings from man-made materials, and though their human-powered attempts at flight never came to fruition, the ideas and creative elements contained within their flying machines were essential to modern aeronautics. Since the time of these early pioneers, flight has continued to captivate humans, and recently, in a departure from creating wings from artificial elements, there has been discussion of using reconstructive surgery to fabricate human wings from human arms. This article is a descriptive study of how one might attempt such a reconstruction and in doing so calls upon essential evidence in the evolution of flight, an understanding of which is paramount to constructing human wings from arms. This includes a brief analysis and exploration of the anatomy of the 150-million-year-old fossil _Archaeopteryx lithographica_, with particular emphasis on the skeletal organization of this primitive bird's wing and wrist. Additionally, certain elements of the reconstruction must be drawn from an analysis of modern birds including a description of the specialized shoulder of the European starling, _Sturnus vulgaris_. With this anatomic description in tow, basic calculations regarding wing loading and allometry suggest that human wings would likely be nonfunctional. However, with the proper reconstructive balance between primitive (_Archaeopteryx_) and modern (_Sturnus_), and in attempting to integrate a careful analysis of bird anatomy with modern surgical techniques, the newly constructed human wings could function as cosmetic features simulating, for example, the nonfunctional wings of flightless birds.