I'm working on a Martian flyer, a biomorph answer to the Ripwing. As Gatecrashing points out that Synergy's Rocs can fly under Martian conditions, these guys should have an easy time at present, and as terraforming continues, an ever easier time - and, as Firewall might care about, easier still on Earth, with its thick ol' radioactive atmosphere. They're being developed by a pissed-off MIT adjunct professor with an axe to grind, and a Firewall operative in the lab across the hall. Shi's adopted (along with a new gender identity of 'hermaphrodite') a "when it's ready" stance toward release, and I'm leaning toward a Barsoomian-friendly, open-source sort of release in protest of the shitty rusters and alpiners with planned obsolescence baked in.
For the record, they're more Ripwing than Lunar Flyer. Their nickname, once recognized as a unique morph, is the "red dragon" morph, though pedants would point out that they're actually wyverns. They've also been in the works since about a year before the Fall, intended as an idealized Martian morph, potentially extensible to Venus after a couple more decades' terraforming, operating on the principe that Martians should be appreciably alien, and the 50/500 rule needs to be respected (hence, by default, all of them are fertile hermaphrodites).
What sort of things should I take into account?
Stats and transcript to follow.
I feel like this would make a good entry in the Farcast yearblog, but I missed the cutoff.
Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.
Martian Flyer
Fri, 2014-08-22 05:35
#1
Martian Flyer
Sun, 2014-08-24 00:55
#2
On Mars, even for Eclipse
On Mars, even for Eclipse Phase, VTOL craft are much for efficient and plausible. The 30% less gravity is nice but the extremely thin atmosphere, even this far into terraforming, would pose an issue. Gatecrashing does mention that srocs can fly there, but it is 'only just'. Keep in mind that this morph would have to be quite large with a huge wingspan--while still being light. Not very effective for some sentinel work.
Sun, 2014-08-31 15:15
#3
Srocs - unavoidably - have a
Srocs - unavoidably - have a considerably lousier wing-loading to body-mass ratio than the things I'm imagining, I took that as confirmation that the concept was workable. Since I've got some time today, I think I'll transcribe the stats and fluff.
Wed, 2014-10-01 03:16
#4
The Dragon's Draft
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xumcPBEcQsztIDLnXmX8Cm5Ot3-jgDTtofax...
This is intended as an early draft for discussion, and grew out of a game that almost was.
In the name of full disclosure, most of my assumptions are based on an old SciFi.com blog called Lab Notes, and were rechecked against more college anatomy and physiology classes than I care to admit to. [url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5_UjlP8kvx-SUxWaGFYQVE0R1U/edit?usp=sh... Lab Notes page is archived here;[/url] I grabbed it just before an announced site redesign pulled it offline forever. Also relevant to this morph is [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294556]"The Morphological Basis of the Arm-To-Wing Transition"[/url] by Samuel O. Poore, MD, PhD, published in the Febuary 2008 edition of the Journal of Hand Surgery. [url=https://hplusbiopolitics.wordpress.com/tag/flight/]Read a writeup here, if you don't want to read the whole paper,[/url] but if you can get journal access, I highly recommend it.
Wed, 2014-10-01 03:23
#5
A quick follow-up
[b]Poore, S.O. The morphological basis of the arm-to-wing transition. J. Hand
Surg. 33: 277-280.[/b]