I'd always thought this was a biblical reference to the bizarre lineage given in "begats" section of the bible, which has bizarre claims of people living to be 930 years of age, and has someone named Methuselah but apparently this has to do with Thomas Malthus.
While I agree that some form of population control is desirable and probably necessary, I do not necessarily agree that social welfare leads to increased population growth among the lower classes, and in fact the data tends to support the opposite conclusion, that people breed more while under stress and living in poverty.
Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.
Malthusian
Mon, 2016-03-28 16:38
#1
Malthusian
Thu, 2016-03-31 12:18
#2
The poor weren't always the
The poor weren't always the most prolific in all circumstances. That has changed however.
From "Fertility trends by social status" by Vegard Skirbekk in Demographic Research, Mar 28, 2008
http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol18/5/18-5.pdf
—
On 'IC Talk': Seyit Karga, Ultimate
[url=http://eclipsephase.com/comment/46317#comment-46317]Character Profile[/url]
Sat, 2016-04-02 18:26
#3
Hmmm
well i guess that might support the opposite conclusion. I think living in a state of constant fear and violence whilst being provided with material abundance in terms of food and other necessities is more likely to result in more children than living in a state of material scarcity but relatively stable governance.
I read a book thats premise was that a woman bio engineered a virus that would result in a massive plague wiping out most of the earths population. Her demands were that the g-8 donate 3% of the nations GDP towards educating women throughout the world because, according to the author, the only definitive policy shown to have an effect on reducing population growth was providing women with an education.
She was very much a malthusian in assuming that overpopulation would result in reduction of the population one way or another, and sort of took the bull by the horns. Might make for a good EP plot.
Tue, 2016-04-05 16:02
#4
Fertilizer Production and the Haber Process
So I've been doing some research, and the reason we are able to sustain the population explosion from the 19th century is in large part due to ammonium nitrate fertilizer which we are able to produce due to the Haber process.
This process is dependent upon fossil fuels to produce the temperatures and pressures required to produce the nearly half billion tons of fertilizer we produce each year. This fertilizer quadruples the yield of land used for agriculture and makes our current population numbers possible.
I do not have any numbers regarding how much fuel it takes to produce this amount of fertilizer every year, but I imagine it requires quite a lot of power.
Wed, 2016-04-06 11:42
#5
If it weren't for industrial
If it weren't for industrial quantities of fertiliser, Malthus' prediction would have likely been pretty accurate. One consequence is a dependency on massive quantities of energy, not to mention the need for the base materials and the logistics to move both those and the finished fertiliser around.
—
On 'IC Talk': Seyit Karga, Ultimate
[url=http://eclipsephase.com/comment/46317#comment-46317]Character Profile[/url]