Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

[Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning

14 posts / 0 new
Last post
Aleksander Aleksander's picture
[Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning

Hello everybody :)

I've been asking myself this question since I first heard about teleportation and cloning. It arises with the subject of resleeving, too. Many people believe it's a way to the immortality, but I find it quite disturbing.

When someone makes a backup of his mind, and then dies losing his current ego - what makes his new morph HIM? I mean, it's basically a perfect clone of that person at a given time, but the real (or the previous, if he had been killed before) one IS dead. There isn't a continuity of thinking, or, as religious people may call it - there's a lack of soul.

What keeps me away from cloning by putting many of my backups into different morphs? Is there a "magic spark", which leaves my mind when I'm dead and goes to the backuping facility? As far as I read the handbook (and I haven't finished it), there's none - one could send a current backup, but it will break the continuity of his conciousness and existence anyway.

I don't want to start a flame on the religious topics and the existence of the soul, but from the purely scientific point of view - isn't that true?

The same comes with the real cloning and teleportation. When one has his head frozen after his death, how could he hope for "waking up" again? Even is he is cloned, the person who wakes up with all his memories and personality is someone else. His light has gone out forever. And it's similar with the teleportation - after being deconstructed to atoms, one dies. How can he "wake up" after being reconstructed, even if all the neurons are intact?

I want to ask You, if You answered this question in Eclipse Phase? Or are going to answer it? Or has anybody ever answered it? Or will?

Anyway, it'll make a good conspiracy theme for EP. Let's plant a seed of fear in players, make them doubt their immortality and stay afraid of every death and resleeve...

puke puke's picture
not quite real science, but

not quite real science, but rather philosophy. what youre interested in is the "continuity of consiousness", which has been a religious question since the dark ages.

does an infomorph die when it copies its self to a new system and erases the original instance? is the new copy a new lifeform but just coincidentially with the memories of the old? depends on your point of view, but essentially the answer is yes. transhumanism probably isnt for the solopsist.

you probably find it quaint now, but the same question used to be asked of people that lapsed into comas, or even when you sleep at night.

Aleksander Aleksander's picture
Philosophy merging with science

I agree, that this question is more philosophical than scientific, but these two are merging in this area. Anyway, people need to find a true answer before starting thinking about resleeving and cloning themselves.

I'd surely decline, if someone offered me an opportunity to clone, resleeve or teleport, unless I were facing death.

What is intrigues me the most - will we ever find the answer? I can't find any way how, as teleportated/resleeved person dies and can't communicate from there. I guess the hope for the afterlife is the only think that is left for us.

It gives me an interesting concept for roleplay - someone who is afraid of dying and of resleeving, egocasting etc and lives to his natural death. Or maybe he was resleeved once and feels he isn't the original man? I think it's worth an archetype entry on the wiki or something ;)

puke puke's picture
its essentially an entire

its essentially an entire in-game faction, based on the catholics in Richard K Morgan's books. here theyre called bioconservatives and they dont just eschew uploading, but also the use of augmentation and nanofabrication and such. probably to make them seem more luddite and villanish.

there are actually rules for exactly the kind of disassociation you are talking about, dealing with alienation and loss of continuity. there are tests for each whenever you resleeve. i would imagine certain personality types wouldnt deal with it well. picture a scenario where you fork your personality and the copy decides to kill the original so as to be the real you.

or when someone is restored from backup but their original self is still out there too. what happens when they meet? when this happens in "Paranoia" games, shootouts usually ensue.

Aleksander Aleksander's picture
Wow...

The more I read the handbook and hear about Eclipse Phase, the more genius this game seems to be... Great job, guys! Your work is the best RPG I know (with Changeling: The Lost being on second place), and You made it Creative Commons!

You've just earned a lifetime fan. (+1)

Now as I read the traits and backgrounds, I know how to make that character mechanically. It'll be Re-Instantiated with Innocious, Edited Memories, Identity Crysis, and Morphing Disorder 3. Heh, this book really feels one with ideas :D

GregH GregH's picture
Frederick Phoul gave a good
Frederick Phoul gave a good shot on this idea with his "Eschaton Sequence" trilogy where several people are copied against their will in an alien society where such copying was commonplace. In a nutshell it came down to go ol' "I think therefore I am" where copies eventually came to the acceptance that even if an original exists what mattered the most was that they themselves existed and ergo owed themselves the right to explore their own individual existences... Rather than fussing over who was the original, all were unique (like loving a diamond not for the whole but for every pretty facet) and special souls with their own destines. Which... If you're a fork with vital experiences your original wants only makes keeping away from re-integration all the more important to you. There's another continuity connundrum in an Asimov yarn... A FTL ship with a robot brain goes nearly catonic before initial flight. The reason? FTL causes those aboard to dematerialize but re-integrate at their destination. Technically this could be seen as "killing" the original crew, they simply take it on faith though that they are still they... The poor computer cannot make that esoteric leap though and goes nuts. As for Bioconservatism I can see a sort of physical pride alongside spiritual reasoning... a group of people that are saying they don't need no stinking resleeving or enhancements, what they have achieved is more authentic or worthy because it was made without such advantages. That's my two cents...
Draconis Draconis's picture
Waiter there's philosophy in my science

The same philosophical question actually occurred to me as well. But frankly from a pragmatic view it's a moot point. I mean everyone is going to die at some point right? Well then at the end it's quite literally do or die. I'm sure the vast majority will pick "do", self preservation and self interest is at the top of human motivations after all. So after it's done, you're resleeved, why worry about the choice? No use worrying about it because it's already been done right? What are you going to do? Kill yourself? Not likely given the drastic in your eyes measure you just took to live further. What's more likely is denial and ignoring that the choice was actually made and just going on with your life.

Ok now take the premise one step further. You're going to resleeve at the end of your life right? Who's to say you won't die next week? And you will die at time X right? So what's the point in not resleeving next week or at any time in the near future? You get to keep your "soul", if it even exists, longer? Now, later, the "milk" as it where will be spilt at some point. No use crying over it.

Rationalization is a wonderful thing.

[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/infected_userbar.jpg[/img]
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/exh_userbar.jpg[/img]

"Do not ask who I am and do not ask me to remain the same" - Michel Foucault

Sir_Psycho Sir_Psycho's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
We shouldn't forget to look at the flipside of this. Some people will embrace this change. Sure, the prospect of physical death will be scary for most, but the prospect of change will be empowering. Hell, in my own life, sometimes I find the things I dislike about myself feel immutable, and changing them is like drawing blood from a stone. The idea that as you fork and backup and resleeve the process changes you would be so dynamic and chaotic. Looking into your memories, good and bad, and realising you would not act that way anymore - it would be like a personality lucky dip, and some people love to gamble.
TheRawrnstuff TheRawrnstuff's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
Also, a thought. The system defines your soul to be "Ego". When you make an exact duplicate of it, how does that Ego differ from the original one? Being exact duplicate, in no way whatsoever. Therefore 1 becomes 1+1, or 2 times 1, one being one as we know it. Therefore, how do you know which 1 is you? I mean that surely you know that you are 1, but so does the other 1. And, by the way, he's thinking exactly same things as you are now, since neither of you have yet had any different surroundings or situations. You both have the same thoughts as you step out from the box. You are being told that You are the clone. No! it wasn't supposed to go like this. You must've been mixed or something, yeah. That must be it. You look exactly same like the other. Why should you believe what someone else says? He's tricked you. That's a lie! ...Isn't it? Okay then. How about neither of you is the one that was cloned. Maybe he was wiped out entirely when he uploaded himself into the machine and gave birth to the 2 new creatures that look just like him? Who are you then?
puke puke's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
i dont know, but you better kill the other one quick -- before he transfers all your pregenitor's cred to someplace you cant access.
The Sandman The Sandman's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
TheRawrnstuff wrote:
Also, a thought. The system defines your soul to be "Ego". When you make an exact duplicate of it, how does that Ego differ from the original one? Being exact duplicate, in no way whatsoever. Therefore 1 becomes 1+1, or 2 times 1, one being one as we know it. Therefore, how do you know which 1 is you? I mean that surely you know that you are 1, but so does the other 1. And, by the way, he's thinking exactly same things as you are now, since neither of you have yet had any different surroundings or situations. You both have the same thoughts as you step out from the box. You are being told that You are the clone. No! it wasn't supposed to go like this. You must've been mixed or something, yeah. That must be it. You look exactly same like the other. Why should you believe what someone else says? He's tricked you. That's a lie! ...Isn't it? Okay then. How about neither of you is the one that was cloned. Maybe he was wiped out entirely when he uploaded himself into the machine and gave birth to the 2 new creatures that look just like him? Who are you then?
And here I suspect you've stumbled across the real reason why alpha forking isn't very common in the EP setting. There really isn't any good way to tell unless you personally created the fork and you both remember the process (which means that your fork remembers coming into existence when you made him, while simultaneously remembering everything else in your life right up to the very moment he was forked off), and even then time, distance and new morphs are going to blur those memories a lot. So it's going to cause all sorts of practical issues related to shared identity if fork and original start conflicting with each other before enough time has passed for the personas to diverge. Now what might be one interesting possibility would be someone who creates a large number of alpha forks of themself as a sort of experiment, and then deliberately disperses them. Have them all awaken in different places, in different bodies, and with different lives, with one little bit of extra functionality built in: every time one of the forks gets backed up, a copy gets sent to wherever the original keeps his own backup and reintegrated.
Zophiel Zophiel's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
For more on the existential question of which fork is the real one and what to do with your old sleeve, see the book (or movie) The Prestige. Each of the two magicians has a different way of dealing with the question.
crawlerzero crawlerzero's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
Aleksander, the same question has caused me to lose sleep over the past several nights since I received my copy. I am still reading all of the material, but I do have an opinion at this point, that may change as I read more. I feel that this thread has come off topic from the original question because of an assumption of the "point of view" in relationship to how a "sleeve" or "clone" is viewed. From an outside point of view, you live on as if nothing happened. Your family and friends are glad to have you back, and your enemies are already conspiring against you again. From an internal perspective, you are dead. A copy is now living with your memories. Please allow me an explanation: We will define the "original" you as YOU_ALPHA. We will define your "resleeve" as YOU_BETA. YOU_ALPHA grew up, got a job, got married, decided ego insurance was a necessity and backed up your ego. Then one day YOU_ALPHA is in a terrible accident and killed. YOU_ALPHA's consciousness ends here. Your lights are out forever. There is no "magic spark" that flies back to inhabit the body of YOU_BETA that is now being downloaded into a new sleeve. YOU_BETA wakes up with all of YOU_ALPHA's memories, beliving himself/herself to be YOU_ALPHA, and is likely informed of what happened. YOU_BETA thinks, "wow, that's a relief. I'm glad I got insurance" but is actually a new consciousness stream with all of the memories of the old. It doesn't remember the accident because it didn't happen to "him" (YOU_BETA). There were several other questions and "what-ifs" that came up in the thread, but I think they only confuse the real issue and the real question. Regardless of how many clones, alpha forks, and resleeves there are, regardless of how confusing it might be to determine which one is the "original" the fact is that one of them is the original, and at the point at which that one dies, the original "you" is dead and the original you stops experiencing existence. Alpha forks is a great way to see this in action. Each one "believes" it is the original, but they don't all experience the world through each other's eyes, do they? Each one lives and dies, and can be copied again. Each consciousness is it's own entity, even if they start out their lives as a perfect copy of the memories and personality of the originator. Is this important from the perspective of a role-playing game? No. Is this important from the pespective of "what would I do in that scenario?" Yes. The last thing to consider is the setting. I think that the book said that there were about eight billion humans on earth at the time of the fall, and that 90% of humanity was terminated. Of the survivors, almost 90% "survived" as infomorphs and backup copies that were transmitted off-world. So that would mean that there were only about 80 million "real human" survivors. In the face of species extinction, I think that most people would have to force themselves to deal with it as a survival mechanism. Given the prospect of total extinction, I would prefer my information "lives on" in the event of my death, even if it is in the form of clones and data backups.
Nicky Nicky's picture
Re: [Real science] Difference between resleeving and cloning
I think in this future, what you are (you ego, your soul, what matters) is not seen as material but as a flow of information. Nowadays, we think as ourselves as "my thought and my body". Our cells, our DNA matter as much as our neural structure. It is our anchor to a "I" that lasts from our birth to our death. Of course, it is all an illusion. Our body is itself a flow of matter. Cells die and are replaced, neurons do the same. The material "I" won't be alive anymore in 6 years (ok I made up this number, I don't remember the exact time. But I believe it is pretty much the right scale), but another body with my DNA (pure information : a twin would have the same but wouldn't be me !), with my possessions, and with a strong psychological and memorial resemblance to me will be alive (and will have sex with my girlfriend ! Damn you ! Okay, same for the girlfriend : dead and replaced). Some spiritual beliefs scream "soooouuuul !", but until something about that is proven, it's just a myth. So as I was saying, in the Eclipse Phase Future, they have used this Resleeving technology for a while. It's not a bold guess to theorize that, at the beginning, people would think as Aleksander : "Ahah ! A mimic of myself ? Not even in a dream !". Then, you would make back-up because "If I died - which I don't want ! -, it would be a mess for my family/friends/society/children. Better be safe than sorry !". Things go on like this and little by little, you find yourself surrounded by friends who have died but have been saved from their back up or Cortical Stack. And you're glad to have them ! You don't think of the ego save as something alien or "not me". The brain is always in motion, what is important is not some stupid cells which will die. What makes someone someone is the flow of information that makes his mind. The form that ego takes is not that important. Hey ! It can run on a computer ! How weird is that ? Not much now, thank you very much. That's one of the steps that transform Humanity into Transhumanity. We're not our DNA anymore. We're not our body. We're not a History that binds us to old tradition which makes no sense anymore. We're not a simple existence which comes from a womb and ends in dust, with a continuity of thought and fear of everything. We're... complicated (I long to see this option available in every field of Facebook !). And if only because mankind is proud, we're fucking better than our monkey-like ancestors ! And of course, what that makes of us is still a question everyone has to answer only for oneself. There has been stupider questions. I hope I was comprehensible (I don't usually speak english) and not too much redundant with previous posts.