I wanted to bring this up, but not in errata, so I'll make my own space for it...
A minor nitpick, on p.39 regarding xenomicrobiology - the odds of anything on an alien planet even being compatible with us is very unlikely. Something like a virus depends on a standardized 'template' for it to effectively infect it, and something like bacteria requires compatible proteins. Anything that is so simple it just eats carbohydrates or something will be effectively dealt with by our immune systems. This is why you don't have to worry about your pet snake getting a cold from you. Even with us sharing 80% of our genetics, diseases rely on so many special conditions that inter-species infection is extremely rare. Crossing the gap not only between species, but completely different gene-forms would be almost impossible. Such a thing would be a huge revolution in science.
You might have the risk of something which causes damage on the molecular level. This is the same concerns as a nanotech attack, affects bio and synthmorphs equally, and has already been dealt with.
Of course, it is still an x-risk (so extreme damage if true), but the risk is miniscule. The quarantine facilities seem reasonable, and from the author's POV it may be a serious risk, but objectively, it really isn't.
My big gripe is p. 16 - time travel. The arguments regarding time travel aren't ones with special relativity and breaking light speed, but with light cones. This section is a strawman argument. I understand that properly addressing this issue would open a huge can of worms, but honestly, I'd rather they not address it at all than address it wrong.
Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.
Gatecrashing - Bad Science
Sun, 2010-12-26 13:40
#1
Gatecrashing - Bad Science
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/infected_userbar.jpg[/img]
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/exh_userbar.jpg[/img]
"Do not ask who I am and do not ask me to remain the same" - Michel Foucault
"I learned the hard way that if you take a stand on any issue, no matter how insignificant, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it." -Jesse "the mind" Ventura.
"I learned the hard way that if you take a stand on any issue, no matter how insignificant, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it." -Jesse "the mind" Ventura.
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/infected_userbar.jpg[/img]
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/exh_userbar.jpg[/img]
"Do not ask who I am and do not ask me to remain the same" - Michel Foucault
"I learned the hard way that if you take a stand on any issue, no matter how insignificant, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it." -Jesse "the mind" Ventura.
"I learned the hard way that if you take a stand on any issue, no matter how insignificant, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it." -Jesse "the mind" Ventura.
+1 r-Rep , +1 @-rep


What do you mean a butterfly cause this ? How a butterfly can cause an enviromental system overload on the other side of a 10 000 egos habitat ?
root@Gatecrashing - Bad Science
[hr] As to EP being a game and not a science paper, I'll misquote Icekatze: Rocket scientists and particle physicists deserve to be entertained too. I'm sure that if the writers of EP wanted something fact checked, they would just have to throw up a thread and they would receive more data than they could handle. There is even a good chance they could ask a question and the thread would end up containing all of the background research needed to write a peer-reviewed science paper on the topic. That way we wouldn't be asking the writers to get fifty doctorate degrees to write a science fiction game, and we would all feel like we contributed and we could bask in all the warm fuzzy feelings that come with that.@-rep +1
|c-rep +1
|g-rep +1
|r-rep +1
]Pages