I delved a bit more in Morph aspects (tags and trait or whatever it is called) and ego stunts. I keep my standing on thinking there are a bit too much sub-systems and terms there. When I read them, I always think either "Well, that's just an aspect" or "yup, that's a stunt". I don't think we would need to define them further down into a "tags" sub-category. Let me quote one really important line in the guide : Traits as Aspects Instead of Stunts If an ego trait from Eclipse Phase is important to your character from a story perspective, but as a player you don’t have a strong feeling about paying refresh for its rules benefit, you can always incorporate that trait into one of your aspects. You got it right with this description. Basically, if it's not important enough for the player then it is not important enough to have its own sub-system, just leave it as an aspect. Don't part with this very important statement which is really the essence of Fate: keep things simple but elegant, easy to use but satisfying. That applies well to tags. What's a tag? It's basically an aspect with added "crunch" to it. To me, that's exactly what a stunt is. The Ego stunt are really interesting and totally on par with the Fate philosophy and rules. But then, under How Morphs Work in Fate, rules explain that you get two aspects, traits, durability and refresh cost. Yet, in the Morphs descriptions, you don't retrieve those two Aspects mentioned (sometimes you have only one or none, sometimes you got 3 or more in the Traits section...) you got traits that are sometimes aspects, sometimes tags, sometimes stunts, sometimes linked to a skill and sometimes you have disadvantage. It's a bit off with what I'm expected to find from what I've just read. It would be a lot more clear and easy in a "close to Fate" sense if you'd drop the idea of tag and disadvantage and keep them just as normal aspects. Players don't NEED to be told that a certain aspect is a disadvantage. It's clear enough that "Genetic defects" is leaning on the negative side. But more than that, the mantra of Fate on aspect is that they are double-edged, say more than one thing, and keep the phrasing simple, which mean that good aspects should be easy to invoke, but also equally easy to compel. They also don't need extra crunch for certain aspects. I totally dig the idea of "upgrading" an aspect into a stunt if the player wants to have more crunch out of an aspect but as I mentioned before, if it's not important enough to have rules of its own but important enough for the character to have it on your character sheet, well that's what an aspect is. So I'd present the Morph information like this, which is more instinctive to Fate players: [b]Name of the Morph[/b] Short description [b]Aspects[/b]: No need for tag or have distinct nomenclature for disadvantage. [b]Durability[/b]: This could also be named Physical Stress or just Stress if wanted to be more close to Fate nomenclature. Otherwise, if you keep it as durability, I'd make the character sheet bears that name too not to get things confusing by mixmatching terminology. [b]Refresh cost[/b]: As for Morphs tags and stunt list... well, if brough back to basic aspects instead of tags, yes, all those descriptions becomes more or less obsolete. Some of those would be easily incorporated into the stunt version of the trait. Mostly, it's the free invocation that don't fit that well. Personally, i don't really like it because it makes for a LOT of bookeeping knowing which tag free invocation you used on that session, which once is per scene, which refresh when, etc. In my own taste, there's already a LOT of aspects in game with basic Fate (each character has 5, each NPC as from 1 to 5), each scene has few, there's also the game aspects, and all the aspects that the players created. You already need to track which as free invocations, which has boost. There's a hell lot going on at the same time. I wouldn't what to add an extra layer of bookeeping which two free invocations on tags. So here goes my opinion. It's really humble, I don't pretend having good ideas or that my ideas are better in any ways. This is totally selfish and based on my personal taste (although I know few players would probably agree). On a side note, I think you guys are missing on a lot of very awesome feedback by not taking opinions from the Fate Core G+ community. I know it's a lot easier to assemble all the information on a single thread (on your forum) but people are not all eager to subscribe to yet another forum. Maybe you'd get a lot more feedback if one could only post on G+ on the matter of Eclipse Fate (or is it officially Transhumanity's Fate?).