Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.
Would EMP blasts (from grenades and the like) jam or scorch spime data collection?
OR
Could a killer use an EMP grenade to hide his identity during a premeditated murder via Nutcracker nanotoxin?
depends on the quality of the splimes. Most would be shut down for a reboot cycle. low quality ones would be rendered inoperable but military grade ones would be unaffected.
Okay cool.
To elaborate, an Async (Lost) murderer is using psi to gain trust, than EMP grenades to disable spimes in the people's personal quarters in the LLA. I am not sure how much privacy the LLA grants its citizens who are well to do enough to afford Splicers and Exalts (actually smuggled Futuras from a defunct Hanto Genetics lab). Then applies Nutcracker to prevent discovery. Mostly the killer is jealously killing and maiming anyone who wears a Futura sleeve.
Would this work? With the EMP grenade versus surveillance. Would that cover his tracks digitally?
It might fuck up their antennae, but the moment someone hooks into them, they ought to be able to get the data. Your Async would likely have better luck hacking them to shut them off.
—
In other words, firing off a laser with a sufficient TWR for the recoil to be noticeable would require a post-miracle-tech laser weighing less than a disposable plastic spoon and powerful enough to shoot down Death Stars? -- ShadowDragon8685
Aren't spimes uber-tiny? And thus, like nanoswarms, susceptible to EMP blasts unlike really overt bots and cameras and the like?
Worse case, Asyncs are creepy bad news and I subscribe to the belief that some Asyncs are more powerful than just level 1 or 2, and that Watts-McLeod is not so benign as the book suggests. So I may just give the killer-async the sleight to disable that level of tech, as the entire async/psi thing is Space-Wizardry.
Assuming spimes are shielded as you suggest, Bursting, could the EMP be strong enough to fry the antennae to render them out, preventing further recording, thus reducing their usefulness?
You could just give the Async Anti-Electronics Field, sure. I think Electronics start working again when they leave, so that could be creepier.
But yeah, depending on how they gather data and what form of information their sensors capture, it would probably damage or disable the sensitive equipment, even if it wouldn't harm the data storage. So it would be like video or whatever of everything up until the Async detonates the grenade then everything goes static (except it would probably be just a burst of static then done). That's useful for blurry image clues if you're doing a murder mystery.
Assuming spimes are shielded as you suggest, Bursting, could the EMP be strong enough to fry the antennae to render them out, preventing further recording, thus reducing their usefulness?
I don't think that they are recording with their antennae.
—
In other words, firing off a laser with a sufficient TWR for the recoil to be noticeable would require a post-miracle-tech laser weighing less than a disposable plastic spoon and powerful enough to shoot down Death Stars? -- ShadowDragon8685
this is not how electromagnetic pulses work. emps fry circuitry. literally. the energy arcs and between circuits melting them. it is also possible that magnetic media will be erased to background noise. there are ways to harden the circuits in their construction but the specifics are unknown to me. theo ther primary method of hardening is a faraday cage. essentially welded rebar cage laced with spirals of copper wire grounded.
What about those hardened laptops?
The books gave me the impression that most tech larger than the tiny bits, including the Swarmoid morph, is shielded so EMP disables tacnets and mesh networks (and maybe Spimes?) but not much more else. Headscratcher.
I think you are referring to the toughbook which do it its metal case probably can only survive on the periphery of the affected area. just remember that any hollywood drama has gotten nukes and especially emps wrong.
Ain't that the truth.
Faraday cages can defend against EMPs. But a large enough FCG-EMP will laugh at the faraday cage and kill the electronic gear inside.
Hardening is usually a matter of adding capacitors and mesh cages to try and reduce the amount of EM that is hitting the electronics.
EMP immune computational equipment is basically Clarktech.
Spimes should not survive even a mild EMP if they are nano scale.
Habitats should die to a large FCG-EMP Those, surprisingly cheap, devices can take out entire city blocks with energy to spare.
Its really not magic-tech, its optical computers. As far as anybody knows, photonic computers should be immune to EM interference.
The trick is that antennas by their very nature must be electric. Those, and their associated hardware would be vulnerable. I think that nanoswarms without communication cannot coordinate or even swarm, which renders them effectively disabled. Thats ignoring any heating damage that could occur as any conductive paths burn.
Photonic computers still have the problem of how to generate the photons.
We have yet to even theorize a method of photon generation for such devices that doesn't use electrical circuitry.
and those producers are the things that would be burned by EMP.