Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

[Worldbuilding] Transhuman Setting Construction Help Requested

17 posts / 0 new
Last post
bibliophile20 bibliophile20's picture
[Worldbuilding] Transhuman Setting Construction Help Requested
Hey all, First off, no, I'm not back. I've got too much on my plate at the moment to be able to commit time here (including a move and I'm between jobs). Secondly, I'm engaged in some massively parallel worldbuilding (4 projects) at the moment, and I'm looking for additional perspectives on aspects of my transhuman setting. Thirdly, and if this is in violation of the site's TOS, I'll take it down, I have an [url=https://www.etsy.com/shop/thejewelersbounty?ref=l2-shopheader-name]Etsy shop[/url]. I make jewelry. If people could take a look, maybe buy something or just spread the word, I'd appreciate it. I could potentially give coupons to EP fans if asked. :) So, the transhuman setting questions: 1. Debating between default/setting names for human-derived intelligences, covering upgraded humans, uplifts, uploads, genetweaked, AIs, and so forth. Options I'm debating between include: panhumanity, earthkin, Solscions, Terra-born, with earthkin being the current preference. 2. Morphological freedom. I can understand, comprehend and appreciate practical upgrades (and I qualify gender modification to make morph gender fit ego gender under "practical"), but I can't comprehend, beyond the most intellectual surface understanding, of modifications for the sake of modification, whether that sake be art, non-conformism, or something else. So I guess I need help understanding not only the motivations of the really out-there individuals, but also some inspirations on the sorts of non-practical mods people might do. 3. I'm trying to stay as hard sci-fi as I can, but I'm using two forms of quasi-FTL in my setting. Two-way point-to-point wormholes, and a "hyperspace" parallel universe accessible from modified wormholes. Access to other universes is possible, but the sort of thing that is potentially lethally hazardous for even the most advanced AIs to attempt (it's the "dialing in" to the right universe that's the trickiest part; given an infinity of universes, most will have physical constants that are wildly different from ours, and it doesn't take much to miss the target universe and hit a different one. And the opening of the gate can result in a "mixing" of constants, which can do... bad things for the local environment, and the attending AI, when, say, the strong nuclear force is suddenly weakened by five orders of magnitude in the vicinity). But I digress. I'm looking for help in understanding what kind of implications for closed time-like curves and other such abuses I have to be aware of for my writing, given that I have it that a ship can pass through a modified wormhole "gate" in our universe, travel to "hyperspace", which has effectively the same physical constants as ours, travel at relativistic velocities in hyperspace for several light-months to another gate, and come out that gate, having traveled roughly two orders of magnitude more distance in our universe. That's the bulk of what I've got. Help of any sort is appreciated.

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -Benjamin Franklin

Erulastant Erulastant's picture
1. Anything goes. Unless
1. Anything goes. Unless there exists alien life, "people" is always a pretty good one. 2. I'd extrapolate out current trends in impractical body-modding. The ones that I, at least, am the most aware of include (Depending on where you draw the line): -Tattoos and piercings -Facelifts, other facial cosmetic surgery -Breast enlargement/reduction -Hair dye So for many, the motivation is to conform: to have the facial structure, body shape, and/or ability to put valuables in one's ears that they believe is expected to look 'beautiful'. Others use body modification to conform to a different set of norms, (See: people with a lot of piercings) to stand out in a crowd, and/or to express themselves as individuals. If that hasn't helped, you should probably try talking to someone who has had some of this body-modding done and get them to explain their motivations to you. This is pretty much just speculation from me. As far as types of modification, what I can think of off the top of my head: -Bone structure changes, especially around the face, but also likely on the hands. (Either to approach a "human ideal" or perhaps adding ridges, or spines or some such, depending on the individual and the culture) -Skin color changes, especially tending towards more vibrant colors or patterns. -A theme song (played from implanted speakers). That'd probably get old fast though, so maybe not. -Gemstones or symbols implanted into the skin. -Vestigial limbs or organs. (including extra faces) -Translucent skin 3. If this project is still going on in, say, November, I should be able to give you a much more certain answer. Right now I know enough to know that I'm probably not understanding things exactly correctly. But, as far as I can tell now, there should not be anything *too* weird with either FTL method. Since neither actually involves moving faster than c, there's no risk of backwards time travel involved. With hyperspace you still have to worry about good old sub-c SR, but that's no biggie. Passengers and crew just have a shorter perception of their trip than outsiders. (Are hyperspace gates more common than regular wormholes? Because I can't imagine anyone wanting to use them otherwise. Seems slower and more dangerous.) Depending on how you're explaining wormholes, you'll probably run into a few GR issues. A suicidal observer travelling into a black hole will never perceive crossing the event horizon (And not just because of the whole dying thing, time stops in that reference frame). I expect wormholes may have the same problem (Though maybe not, the only presently imagined physical examples of wormholes are black holes, so if there is another way for them to exist, we (or at least I) can't tell what properties it would have that are different from a black hole wormhole)
You, too, were made by humans. The methods used were just cruder, imprecise. I guess that explains a lot.
Holy Holy's picture
bibliophile20 wrote:Hey all,
bibliophile20 wrote:
Hey all, First off, no, I'm not back. I've got too much on my plate at the moment to be able to commit time here (including a move and I'm between jobs).
Nonetheless nice to know that you are alive, well up and involved in interesting projects. :-) All the best for your worlds to be!
bibliophile20 bibliophile20's picture
Erulastant wrote:1. Anything
Erulastant wrote:
1. Anything goes. Unless there exists alien life, "people" is always a pretty good one.
I was trying to think of an equivilent to EP's "transhumanity" and Orion Arm's "Terragen" to use as a shorthand in my writing rather than repeatedly writing "humans and human-descended intelligences". And, oh yes, there are aliens. Just one species, but they're called the Fermi--as in they're the answer to the Fermi Paradox: Where are the aliens? Answer: At least one species got there first and they go around wiping out potential competitors, and my transhuman setting is one where we were next on their list. Not as god-like as EP's ETI, though. Closer to Safehold's Gbaba.
Quote:
3. If this project is still going on in, say, November, I should be able to give you a much more certain answer. Right now I know enough to know that I'm probably not understanding things exactly correctly. But, as far as I can tell now, there should not be anything *too* weird with either FTL method. Since neither actually involves moving faster than c, there's no risk of backwards time travel involved. With hyperspace you still have to worry about good old sub-c SR, but that's no biggie. Passengers and crew just have a shorter perception of their trip than outsiders.
Alrighty. Given my progress (I'm still in the scaffolding stage), I have no doubt that this'll still be an active project multiple Novembers from now.
Quote:
(Are hyperspace gates more common than regular wormholes? Because I can't imagine anyone wanting to use them otherwise. Seems slower and more dangerous.)
The hyperspace gates are modified wormholes, designed to reach a different "brane" universe; once opened, they're open until destroyed (which radiates most of the wormhole's mass away as energy. Minimum safe distance is an appreciable fraction of a lightyear). It's the actually opening of them that's the hazardous part. Once they're open, they're capable of supporting two-way traffic. Meanwhile wormholes are strictly point-to-point, and you have to arrange them with considerable care to avoid CTLCs, as well as having to deal with transit time between the different mouths. In my setting, the hyperspace is new (less than 200 years old), while the wormhole network is millenia old, but the combination of the two adds significant routing advantages in fleet and commerce movement.
Quote:
Depending on how you're explaining wormholes, you'll probably run into a few GR issues. A suicidal observer travelling into a black hole will never perceive crossing the event horizon (And not just because of the whole dying thing, time stops in that reference frame). I expect wormholes may have the same problem (Though maybe not, the only presently imagined physical examples of wormholes are black holes, so if there is another way for them to exist, we (or at least I) can't tell what properties it would have that are different from a black hole wormhole)
I'm stealing liberally from Orion's Arm in the makeup of my wormholes, for the simple expedient that they've already done the research to make them theoretically consistant, and I'm not above saving myself some work, considering how much additional effort this whole project is going to take in detailing societies, cultures, history and technology, much less the part of actually writing the story :) Short version, massive, connected black holes that have been modified using exotic matter that allows physical matter and electromagnetic radiation to pass through between two widely seperated locations.
Holy wrote:
Nonetheless nice to know that you are alive, well up and involved in interesting projects. :-) All the best for your worlds to be!
Thanks. :)

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -Benjamin Franklin

ORCACommander ORCACommander's picture
Earthkin Sounds best I think
Earthkin Sounds best I think but what about Solkin? well horns will prbly be a fad. whether are bony or soft tissue is up to you though. prehensile tails might catch on but that again is the practical side of things. I could see extra breasts or multiple penises being an thing among the pornography studios. After all if it exists there is a fetish for it manipulating wormholes.... that is some serious I would say s2 or 3 level tech there. I'd have the people able to use it but not understand why it works and have groups going around trying to prove that it can't work at all. Avoid making new additions to the periodic table. new compounds on the other hand give a half logical composition for :) Keep in mind energy requirements. How are things are powered and what is the average wattage outputted. Harrington verse is noted that warships require power output in the tetrawatt range You'll always be welcome home. we leave the door unlocked :)
Erulastant Erulastant's picture
ORCACommander wrote:
ORCACommander wrote:
Avoid making new additions to the periodic table. new compounds on the other hand give a half logical composition for :)
Wormhole manipulation requires exotic matter, which wouldn't even be on the periodic table. It would by definition be composed of something besides protons, neutrons, and electrons. I don't know about the particular requirements of wormholes, but I suspect the exotic matter in question has negative mass, or inertial mass different from gravitational charge, or something like that. No fancy compound is going to work here. Bibliophile, I was looking over the Orion's Arm wormholes a bit. It seems as if in that setting the wormholes are built and placed as opposed to naturally occurring. Is this going to be the same in your setting?
You, too, were made by humans. The methods used were just cruder, imprecise. I guess that explains a lot.
bibliophile20 bibliophile20's picture
Erulastant wrote
Erulastant wrote:
ORCACommander wrote:
Avoid making new additions to the periodic table. new compounds on the other hand give a half logical composition for :)
Wormhole manipulation requires exotic matter, which wouldn't even be on the periodic table. It would by definition be composed of something besides protons, neutrons, and electrons. I don't know about the particular requirements of wormholes, but I suspect the exotic matter in question has negative mass, or inertial mass different from gravitational charge, or something like that. No fancy compound is going to work here. Bibliophile, I was looking over the Orion's Arm wormholes a bit. It seems as if in that setting the wormholes are built and placed as opposed to naturally occurring. Is this going to be the same in your setting?
Wormholes will be artifically created, as will the hyperspace gates, yes. Placing them requires some very specially designed ships, capable of moving a very tiny and very heavy dense mass at significant fractions of c. Needless to say, my earthkin civilizations will be Kardashev II multiple times over. As for exotic matter, yes, wormhole-scaffolding, some computronium classifications, as well as probably several classes of ultra-dense, high-tensile-strength building materials, plus some other odds and ends will all be present, if not commonplace. Although, to spare ORCACommander's concerns, I've already committed myself to do my best to adhere to [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MinovskyPhysics]Minovsky Physics[/url], and avoid producing any Handwaivium in my multiple-AU radius, 10^21 watt particle accelerators powered by total mass-energy conversion. :p It'll be difficult, especially if I'm to avoid Weber-class infodumps, but I'll do my best.

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -Benjamin Franklin

Chernoborg Chernoborg's picture
How does alt-humanity sound?
How does alt-humanity sound? It can invoke both "altered" or "alternate" as a descriptor. I almost suggested alt-terran as a way of avoiding the "human" connotation, but that just implies they could move through many different environments!
Current Status: Highly Distracted building Gatecrashing systems in Universe Sandbox!
Lorsa Lorsa's picture
Some thoughts from me:
Some thoughts from me: 1. Is there any specific reason why there couldn't be a multitude of names? If your setting is large enough, people in different cultures might use different names. So take all your ideas and use them! Add some derogatory words as well and you are set to go. 2. Everyone does body modification beyond the practical to some degree. Most of us get haircuts (or beard cuts), use hairdye, pluck eyebrows etc. Those are body-modifcations to some degree, so if you can understand those you could extrapolate from there. For more extreme modifcations it basically comes down to the same reason we do most things. It stimulates our pleasure centre. Many people who get one tatoo (either because they want to look pretty, or because it represents some significant event in their life or whatever), oftern end up getting more of them later. Same with plastic surgery. Body modification is addictive, because it stimulates our brain in certain ways. Apart from that, there are any number of core reasons why people might choose one thing or another, which has been mentioned earlier. Either they do it to blend in, or to stick out, or to simply express their personality. I think it's up to you to decide how 'weird' you are assuming that people will be in your setting, but things that are not too outrageous would be stuff like extra arms, minor animal features (gotta love those catgirls), non-natural skin- and haircolour, wings (even if they don't work), fantasy race appearances etc. I can give you a ton of more ideas if you want "mostly human but with cool mods". If you want more posthuman ideas there'll be others that are way better at that. 3. From a purely narrative perspective, as long as people don't travel "backwards" in time, you should be fine. The problem is usually when your actual speed increases beyond the speed of light, as then you will disagree with other observers about the order in which events take place. Simply jumping from one place to another [i]should[/i] (I think) retain causality.
Lorsa is a Forum moderator [color=red]Red text is for moderator stuff[/color]
ORCACommander ORCACommander's picture
Oh ya the early books in
Oh ya the early books in HHverse can be rather tedious. Also another body mod: bioluminescence in all colors and patterns
Zarpaulus Zarpaulus's picture
Well, Terragen actually isn't
Well, Terragen actually isn't exclusive to Orion's Arm, it's been used in David Brin's Uplift series, though in that case it's used because Terra has at least three sapient species: Human-ul-chimpanzee-ul-dolphin, chimpanzee-ab-human, and dolphin-ab-human. Actually that's why it's used in OA too, because AIs and Provolves aren't genetically descended from humans but are genetically or memetically of Terran descent. If there's no Uplifts or AGIs, just variants of human, transhumanity could work.
ThatWhichNeverWas ThatWhichNeverWas's picture
I am the Lobsterpus.
1. I'd say go simple – Solars. 2. There are loads of reasons. If you're talking purely cosmetic enhancement, then a lot of stuff is going to be to evoke a reaction on others, regardless of positive or negative. In that case, you modify because you think you'll be more beautiful, or because you want to freak out the normals. If you're talking about something a little... deeper, then it's a different story. Speaking personally, there's an... attraction... to the unusual. It could be called xeno- or neo-philia, but it's ultimately a deep seated desire to not just look but to actually be something fundamentally different. There's perhaps a knee-jerk reaction to condemn that behaviour because it can be driven by self-loathing or dissatisfaction in everyday life, but it can also arise from the desire for self-improvement, self-actualization or just plain old hope. Even cosmetic changes can be satisfying to that urge, either from the view that your appearance is just another aspect of yourself to improve or from the changing reactions of people reaffirming your other-ness. With every modification, you take a step further from the pale, and one closer to the endless wonders of Potential. That's of course completely ignoring boring stuff like modifying yourself as a way of showing your membership to “augmented culture”, or getting mods “just in case”. In any case, it's hard to imagine what “non-practical” would be, beyond cosmetic, and there the limit is simply the tech level of the setting, or rather the ruleset. Differing bone structures, including extra or removed limbs, spikes, barbs, antlers,extra eyes, compound eyes, scales, an exoskeleton instead of an endoskeleton, flippers, tentacles, metal plating, plastic shells, extra organs, visible organs, antenna, whiskers, and claws all in differing colours and textures, and bio- or electro-luminescence on everything. Seriously, if it exists on a living or artificial thing, then people will get it as a mod. You're probably best off looking at fantasy races (because there's no way in hell people won't be turning into elves, werewolves and vampires) for the more mundane stuff, for the hardcore look at mixes of insects, ocean creatures and animals. As an aside, have you considered using material from one of your other universes as the material for wormhole stabilization, or in general about what happens to stuff from the other side of the gates that's brought over here?
In the past we've had to compensate for weaknesses, finding quick solutions that only benefit a few. But what if we never need to feel weak or morally conflicted again?
ORCACommander ORCACommander's picture
I'd argue its a bit of darker
I'd argue its a bit of darker urge than that, at least in modern society, TWNW. Right now people are spoon fed from the cradle that they are special and unique when the sad reality is whether they realize it on a conscious level or not they are not special or unique. thus the subconscious or conscious urge to modify oneself stems stems from that denial of being unique and special.
bibliophile20 bibliophile20's picture
Chernoborg wrote:How does alt
Chernoborg wrote:
How does alt-humanity sound? It can invoke both "altered" or "alternate" as a descriptor. I almost suggested alt-terran as a way of avoiding the "human" connotation, but that just implies they could move through many different environments!
Hmm. Certainly a possibility.
Lorsa wrote:
Some thoughts from me: 1. Is there any specific reason why there couldn't be a multitude of names? If your setting is large enough, people in different cultures might use different names. So take all your ideas and use them! Add some derogatory words as well and you are set to go.
While there will no doubt be a multitude of names in the setting itself, I'm trying to come up with a decent name to use in my expository writing within the setting. Orion's Arm's conceit, for example, is that it is composed of excerpts from a future encyclopedia and uses a consistent name for Earth-origin intelligences--Terragen--in those entries. So I'd like to have a consistent name for when I'm doing my own background construction to avoid confusion ("hey, here you use "Earthkin" and here you use "Solars". What gives?"), and save the multitude of names for when I'm actually writing the story itself. Basically, I'm looking for a consistent shorthand for "humans, modified humans and human-created intelligences"
Lorsa wrote:
2. Everyone does body modification beyond the practical to some degree. Most of us get haircuts (or beard cuts), use hairdye, pluck eyebrows etc. Those are body-modifcations to some degree, so if you can understand those you could extrapolate from there. For more extreme modifcations it basically comes down to the same reason we do most things. It stimulates our pleasure centre. Many people who get one tatoo (either because they want to look pretty, or because it represents some significant event in their life or whatever), oftern end up getting more of them later. Same with plastic surgery. Body modification is addictive, because it stimulates our brain in certain ways. Apart from that, there are any number of core reasons why people might choose one thing or another, which has been mentioned earlier. Either they do it to blend in, or to stick out, or to simply express their personality. I think it's up to you to decide how 'weird' you are assuming that people will be in your setting, but things that are not too outrageous would be stuff like extra arms, minor animal features (gotta love those catgirls), non-natural skin- and haircolour, wings (even if they don't work), fantasy race appearances etc. I can give you a ton of more ideas if you want "mostly human but with cool mods". If you want more posthuman ideas there'll be others that are way better at that.
Except that I don't even get really out-there haircuts. :) I've dyed my hair for Halloween once (aparently I make a rather convincing redhead). And then I look at people with mohawks and the like and my only thought is how impractical they are. Hence why I need help with understanding the motivations and mindset. Your comments do help with that.
Lorsa wrote:
3. From a purely narrative perspective, as long as people don't travel "backwards" in time, you should be fine. The problem is usually when your actual speed increases beyond the speed of light, as then you will disagree with other observers about the order in which events take place. Simply jumping from one place to another [i]should[/i] (I think) retain causality.
And that's what I need help with. I guess at a minimum I should put an expository comment in the story itself about unspecified "bad things" that happen when people tried to use the FTL systems for time travel.
Zarpaulus wrote:
Well, Terragen actually isn't exclusive to Orion's Arm, it's been used in David Brin's Uplift series, though in that case it's used because Terra has at least three sapient species: Human-ul-chimpanzee-ul-dolphin, chimpanzee-ab-human, and dolphin-ab-human. Actually that's why it's used in OA too, because AIs and Provolves aren't genetically descended from humans but are genetically or memetically of Terran descent. If there's no Uplifts or AGIs, just variants of human, transhumanity could work.
By the time that my actual narrative will be set, there will be hundreds of thousands of varieties of human, an equal if not greater number of uplift species, and AIs ranging from human-level intellect to inhabiting Jupiter-brains and Dyson Swarms. Cool to know that Terragen isn't original or exclusive to OA, though. :)
ThatWhichNeverWas wrote:
1. I'd say go simple – Solars.
Hmm. Certainly a possibility.
ThatWhichNeverWas wrote:
2. There are loads of reasons. If you're talking purely cosmetic enhancement, then a lot of stuff is going to be to evoke a reaction on others, regardless of positive or negative. In that case, you modify because you think you'll be more beautiful, or because you want to freak out the normals. If you're talking about something a little... deeper, then it's a different story. Speaking personally, there's an... attraction... to the unusual. It could be called xeno- or neo-philia, but it's ultimately a deep seated desire to not just look but to actually be something fundamentally different. There's perhaps a knee-jerk reaction to condemn that behaviour because it can be driven by self-loathing or dissatisfaction in everyday life, but it can also arise from the desire for self-improvement, self-actualization or just plain old hope. Even cosmetic changes can be satisfying to that urge, either from the view that your appearance is just another aspect of yourself to improve or from the changing reactions of people reaffirming your other-ness. With every modification, you take a step further from the pale, and one closer to the endless wonders of Potential. That's of course completely ignoring boring stuff like modifying yourself as a way of showing your membership to “augmented culture”, or getting mods “just in case”. In any case, it's hard to imagine what “non-practical” would be, beyond cosmetic, and there the limit is simply the tech level of the setting, or rather the ruleset. Differing bone structures, including extra or removed limbs, spikes, barbs, antlers,extra eyes, compound eyes, scales, an exoskeleton instead of an endoskeleton, flippers, tentacles, metal plating, plastic shells, extra organs, visible organs, antenna, whiskers, and claws all in differing colours and textures, and bio- or electro-luminescence on everything. Seriously, if it exists on a living or artificial thing, then people will get it as a mod. You're probably best off looking at fantasy races (because there's no way in hell people won't be turning into elves, werewolves and vampires) for the more mundane stuff, for the hardcore look at mixes of insects, ocean creatures and animals.
Excellent! That sort of help with the mindset is exactly what I was looking for, thank you!
ThatWhichNeverWas wrote:
As an aside, have you considered using material from one of your other universes as the material for wormhole stabilization, or in general about what happens to stuff from the other side of the gates that's brought over here?
Yep, I have indeed. I got the idea in the first place from an old Asimov book called The Gods Themselves. Materials that transition between universes will be subject to the new universe's physical laws, and if those laws would render them unstable, then, well... boom. Or worse. The "hyperspace" that they use is simply another universe that has physical laws nearly identical to that of our own, simply with a "shorter" coordinate distance, meaning that baryonic matter and electromagnetism as they exist in our universe can exist there without spontaneously exploding or somesuch. (that universe, in addition, has one other significant difference than ours: no matter-antimatter asymmetery. So it's empty... and utterly black.) Other universes that they've connected to are "mined" for energy and as a source of exotic matter, but they have to be very careful. At the gate location itself, the physical laws of both universes "meet" and mix, and if they're too dissimilar, bad things happen. For example, there is at least one region about 20 LY across where there was what amounted to a lab accident that's simply called "The Death Zone". In the current era of the narritive, it's stabilized and started to shrink as our universe's physical laws re-impose themselves, but within that sphere, no baryonic matter can exist--just a soup of quarks and other subatomic particles. The AI that was in the process of experimenting with new gates to open made a tiny mistake and "dialed in" to open a gate to a different universe than it had intended. That different universe had such rampantly different physical constants that even the short mixing and bleed-through for the few seconds that the gate was open was enough to damage the local fabric of space-time and the local expressions of the physical constants. I'll leave it up to people's imaginations the results on baryonic matter--and the living beings and stars that that matter makes up--when suddenly the strong and weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism and gravity all suddenly start acting as constant as a politician's integrity.

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -Benjamin Franklin

Erulastant Erulastant's picture
Bibliophile wrote:
Bibliophile wrote:
The "hyperspace" that they use is simply another universe that has physical laws nearly identical to that of our own, simply with a "shorter" coordinate distance, meaning that baryonic matter and electromagnetism as they exist in our universe can exist there without spontaneously exploding or somesuch. (that universe, in addition, has one other significant difference than ours: no matter-antimatter asymmetery. So it's empty... and utterly black.)
Well, assuming all else is the same (Which I know, silly and probably incorrect assumption) there are a few facts that are implied: -If the rate of expansion follows the same curve that it does in our universe, this would suggest that the hyperspace universe is a good deal younger than ours. (Has expanded less) -Less expansion also means the cosmic microwave background would be "brighter", in that the photons that make it up should have higher energy. It might even be in the visible spectrum! I might get back to this later and calculate how young the universe would have to be for the CMB to be visible. -(Lack of matter/antimatter asymmetry suggests that decoupling time was probably way closer to the beginning of the universe, incidentally. Also, the addition of matter/antimatter annihilations would put three spikes in the blackbody curve of the CMB. This latter detail would be helpful for curious astrophysicists trying to determine the age of the hyperverse.) -Space would not be completely empty-- Large structures couldn't form, but there will still be stray particles populating the universe (Since high energy photons can spontaneously decay into particle/antiparticle pairs, an equilibrium would be reached. How this equilibrium point compares to our universe's stray particle density is up to you to determine--Relevant factors are how much smaller the universe is, and how the starting mass compared to ours. Keep in mind that most of our universe's (light) matter is locked up in stars n' such, whereas none of this universe's matter would be)
You, too, were made by humans. The methods used were just cruder, imprecise. I guess that explains a lot.
ThatWhichNeverWas ThatWhichNeverWas's picture
Science: Ruining Everything Since 1543
ORCACommander wrote:
I'd argue its a bit of darker urge than that, at least in modern society, TWNW. Right now people are spoon fed from the cradle that they are special and unique when the sad reality is whether they realize it on a conscious level or not they are not special or unique. thus the subconscious or conscious urge to modify oneself stems stems from that denial of being unique and special.
I don't know what you're talking about. Everyone is unique and/or special. Each individual represents an utterly distinct collection of experiences and skills, and as such a unique viewpoint of the world. The problem occurs when people try base their self-worth on their abilities in relation to others; the need to be the “best”. That's how I see it anyway. Going back to EP for a second, this can feed pretty well into Titan/ETI motivation; any single method to attempt to increase intelligence is going to eventually plateau, either through physical limitations or through methodological ones. Once you reach that point, the only way to increase your effective intelligence is to acquire different ways of approaching problems. The TITANS at least have computronium, so the possibilities of increasing processing power above a certain point are limited, as increase in distance from new processors will introduce lag due to limitations on how fast information can travel, and introduce more possibility for noise. To advance further, they need to learn to look at things in different ways... and so they start uploading people. The ETI can take it a bit further; it harvests civilizations. Just a thought. In any case, yeah, that could absolutely be a reason to get into augmentation, although it's one that's doomed to end badly. It depends on the individual, really.
bibliophile20 wrote:
Excellent! That sort of help with the mindset is exactly what I was looking for, thank you!
You are welcome :) It's not often I get to talk about it, so it was a nice change :D
bibliophile20 wrote:
So it's empty... and utterly black.
Hah! Glorious. What I wouldn't give to listen to that conversation. “Greetings, science minion. What have you discovered?” “Almighty Funding-Master, we have discovered a realm of purest night, an unending void of echoing silence and darkness known only to those born blind and deaf. To call it the domain of Death would be false, for there can be no death where the spark of life was stillborn.” “Excellent! We shall use it to transport Kumquats! Deploy the Fleet!
In the past we've had to compensate for weaknesses, finding quick solutions that only benefit a few. But what if we never need to feel weak or morally conflicted again?
ORCACommander ORCACommander's picture
Most of that uniqueness or
Most of that uniqueness or specialness has no real world application. Most human beings are expendable interchangeable parts :) I would not say the need to be the best but the need to be useful. but we digress I like that idea of the platou and the harvesting of civilizations