Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

The (transhunan) birds & the bees

39 posts / 0 new
Last post
SEÑOR FASE SEÑOR FASE's picture
The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Hi: One of my players got all crazee on me last time, blasting a barrage of all sorts of reproductive & childhood questions about the setting... For instance: What happens when a morph, like a splicer, lets say, gives birth (the ole fashioned way)... Will the newborn be another splicer, or a flat? Ditto for exalts, remade, all that apply... Help! What happens when two "organic" (non-uplifts) morphs reproduce (like a splicer & a remade, for instance), what morph will the baby be? What exactly are exowombs? - I can't find them in any of my products. Thanks! SF
GreyBrother GreyBrother's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Questions as old as the game itself. You may want to use the search function with tags like procreation, exowomb etc
Quincey Forder Quincey Forder's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
That's to assume their morph isn't barren by design (copyright and all that) nothing stops their users to...practice, none the less I'm really curious to know how an Octopus and a transhuman can consume their love, though... Tentacle hentai, anyone?
[center] Q U I N C E Y ^_*_^ F O R D E R [/center] Remember The Cant! [img]http://tinyurl.com/h8azy78[/img] [img]http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg205/tachistarfire/theeye_fanzine_us...
SEÑOR FASE SEÑOR FASE's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
GreyBrother wrote:
Questions as old as the game itself. You may want to use the search function with tags like procreation, exowomb etc
Hi! So, no simple (short) answers, no page ref number...Yes? SF
Decivre Decivre's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Quincey Forder wrote:
That's to assume their morph isn't barren by design (copyright and all that) nothing stops their users to...practice, none the less
I imagine that most morphs aren't designed barren, and even if they are, it shouldn't be particularly hard to make them fertile again (which is why access to healing vats is probably restricted in places where copyright is a major issue). The real question becomes how many elements of a morph actually breed true, and how many of them simply don't pass on to offspring. Cyberware likely doesn't, and nanoware probably doesn't permanently (though I imagine that a mother with respirocytes would pass those respirocytes to her child, that child would probably not have the means to maintain the swarm in the bloodstream). Bioware may not even, as well as some traits unique to the morph. It may be a varying issue, depending on the way the morph is designed and how it's genetic code is structured. In fact, because some morphs may have a differing number of chromosomes (I imagine the Remade to have this), they may be completely incompatible with other morphs. Of course, if you want an easy answer that you can use immediately in the games, I would just go with flats make flats, uplifts make uplifts, synths can breed and everything else makes splicers. :P
Quincey Forder wrote:
I'm really curious to know how an Octopus and a transhuman can consume their love, though... Tentacle hentai, anyone?
Considering that it's a 12-hour healing vat procedure to have a sex change, my guess is that you can have a similar healing vat operation to give yourself "exotic recreational organs and appendages". That's assuming that two people won't simply find a way to have fun with the organs and appendages they already have. I'm sure that transhuman society has had at least enough living with unusual bodies to figure that one out, and even those who don't know can probably look it up on the mesh.
Transhumans will one day be the Luddites of the posthuman age. [url=http://bit.ly/2p3wk7c]Help me get my gaming fix, if you want.[/url]
LatwPIAT LatwPIAT's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
"[i]Remember, genes are NOT blueprints. This means you can't, for example, insert "the genes for an elephant's trunk" into a giraffe and get a giraffe with a trunk. There are no genes for trunks. What you CAN do with genes is chemistry, since DNA codes for chemicals. For instance, we can in theory splice the native plants' talent for nitrogen fixation into a terran plant.[/i]" Prokhor Zakharov, Nonlinear Genetics From my (admittedly limited) understanding of genetics, traits that are innately biological (i.e. they're encoded in the morphs genes[sup]1[/sup]) would/could be encoded in the 46 chromosomes of the biomorph. If two biomorphs of different kinds then attempted to have a child completely without any medical assistance, the result would be that the resulting zygote would have a random selection of the genes for the traits of both parents. This doesn't necessarily mean that the fully developed morph will have the fully expressed traits (e.g. pre-installed bioware[sup]1[/sup]) of their parents. As stated in the quote above, genes aren't blueprints. Instead, they're instructions for how to make proteins and the fractal structures and stuff that give rise to larger organs. However, since the organs (and, hence, transhuman "unnatural" organs) are the product of these genes working together, the combination of two genetic codes from two differently coded sources could give rise to conflicts or simply the lack of all the parts necessary to create a full structure. Or, perhaps, two different strings of DNA will fight over the space they need to form an organ. You might end up with a form of auto-chimerism, where a single organ is made from two completely different phenotypes. For example, if both parents had genetically altered eye-colours (red & blue, for simplicity), the child might end up with some shade of purple as a result of both red and blue pigments being expressed. Or they might end up with heterochromia or sector-heterochromia. (In terms of EP, they might end up with Enhanced Vision in only one eye.) And that's a relatively mild example. If you're unlucky, you might end up in a situation where part of the transhuman genotype is missing, so the child ends up with a faulty phenotype and the resulting complications. Imagine that only half the stuff needed to grow a bioware organ is present, so you end up with one that doesn't work. Half of a drug-gland would and could lead to some rather interesting complications, such as the drug being dumped uncontrolled or improperly synthesized, leading to severe complications and/or poisoning. You'd essentially get weird half-breed babies. (I don't know very much about genetics...) Now, one thing that was suggested by another poster in an earlier thread on this subject is that the more radical alterations to the biomorph's biochemistry could be encoded in extraneous chromosomes (a 47th, a 48th, etc.), such that they could easily be removed from the sex cells by specialized proteins, which would allow for a "standard" set of genes (some form of Splicer would be most likely, though I imagine Rusters would produce Rusters, and Remade Remade) to be passed on to the zygote-stage. [1]: It seems unlikely to me that installing bioware in a morph would completely alter it on the genetic level due to the immense job it would be to rewrite every single strand of DNA in the body. Installing minor bioware takes 1 hour in a Healing Vat, and even with 12 hours for major bioware, we're talking about 10[sup]13[/sup] to 10[sup]14[/sup] cells that each must be rewritten. For comparison, the book gives 3 days timeframe for "Major physical modifications like adding limbs or radical changes to height and weight."; anatomical changes like this probably involve having to rewrite the majority of the homeobox genes of the body (and also time to grow the new limb, which already is a timescale of 12 hours given the time needed to regrow one - of course, you can't have extra biological limbs going by a literal reading of the rules, so it's more likely the time needed to install the socket for a Cyberlimb Plus), or at the very least in the local area (which for "radical changes to height and weight" would be very large parts of the body). I find it more likely, from a very technical viewpoint, that most after-production bioware is installed as, essentially, a special form of chimerism wherein the organ is grown (using the recipients DNA as a base) inside their body, essentially as a foreign object or, if you will, parasite.
@-rep +2 C-rep +1
OneTrikPony OneTrikPony's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
LatwPIAT gives a pretty good summation of the more realistic consensus in most other procreation threads. There really isn't a lot of direct reference to your question in any of the books. The one exception is a mention in the Mars section of Sunward that most people do not own their own genetics. (meaning that there is some form of super tough DRM that is expensive to hack in most morphs.) My personal opinion is that the more specialized and expensive the morph the less chance that it will be fertile. And in the inner system corporate morphs are rarely fertile regardless of type. If you can get your morph genetically unlocked the bioware that is included in the base model is a result of Xtrasomes and will not transfer to the zygote. Ware that has been installed in an adult morph does not transfer. The questions of Aptitudes, Aptitude maximums, and Durability are still interesting. But questions of the type; "what if an "unlocked" Menton bangs an "Unlocked" Fury?" have so many permutations you could fill a book answering them on a case by case basis. If there is a general answer it is NOT that you get a Super Smart Fury or a Super tough Menton obviously, because if that were true then there would be some type of SuperDuperWonderkin morph avalilable and that doesn't exist in the setting. The fact that Furies, Mentons, and Remades are the pinnacle of biotech indicates that (IF) interbreeding is possible in such heavily modified human stock the process is Not additive. (Although the Exhumans are probably working on making it happen. It doesn't happen currently or commonly.) As a GM the easiest thing to do is probably to declare that regardless of what the parents are, you end up with a Splicer or Exalt child and after that you get what you pay (the genehacker) for.

Mea Culpa: My mode of speech can make others feel uninvited to argue or participate. This is the EXACT opposite of what I intend when I post.

GreyBrother GreyBrother's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
SEÑOR FASE wrote:
Hi! So, no simple (short) answers, no page ref number...Yes? SF
Definitly not short, yes. Just look at what the guys posted after you ^^ We don't even know what the most used way of procreation in Eclipse Phase is. We know, people have casual sex, yes. But how a new ego is produced is a big question with many different answers.
Cifer Cifer's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Considering the whole morph thing is still comparably new, I'd assume that just like modern day modified plant seed, most morphs won't breed true, not even when paired with another morph of the same kind. Not taking fertility and "truebreeding" into account will allow a morph designer access to a lot more shortcuts. That said, I'd consider it likely that the Ultimates are working on a Remade morph that can naturally breed true (or maybe they don't care about that at all and have abolished reproctive capabilities in their morphs altogether - that probably depends on the specific ultimate's personal philosophy).
Decivre Decivre's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
LatwPIAT wrote:
It seems unlikely to me that installing bioware in a morph would completely alter it on the genetic level due to the immense job it would be to rewrite every single strand of DNA in the body. Installing minor bioware takes 1 hour in a Healing Vat, and even with 12 hours for major bioware, we're talking about 10[sup]13[/sup] to 10[sup]14[/sup] cells that each must be rewritten. For comparison, the book gives 3 days timeframe for "Major physical modifications like adding limbs or radical changes to height and weight."; anatomical changes like this probably involve having to rewrite the majority of the homeobox genes of the body (and also time to grow the new limb, which already is a timescale of 12 hours given the time needed to regrow one - of course, you can't have extra biological limbs going by a literal reading of the rules, so it's more likely the time needed to install the socket for a Cyberlimb Plus), or at the very least in the local area (which for "radical changes to height and weight" would be very large parts of the body). I find it more likely, from a very technical viewpoint, that most after-production bioware is installed as, essentially, a special form of chimerism wherein the organ is grown (using the recipients DNA as a base) inside their body, essentially as a foreign object or, if you will, parasite.
While I agree this is probably the most common means of adding bioware, it's not necessarily too difficult to genetically alter an organism so that newly-added bioware is grounded in the genetic code. Tailored retroviruses could be used post-implant to alter the transhumans genetics over time. So for instance, if you get toxin filters at your local genehacker's shop it'll take just an hour, but he can also inject a TRV or a nanoswarm into your system that alters your DNA in every cell over the course of weeks or months. Hence the reason that it's very possible for bioware to be a breedable trait.
Cifer wrote:
Considering the whole morph thing is still comparably new, I'd assume that just like modern day modified plant seed, most morphs won't breed true, not even when paired with another morph of the same kind. Not taking fertility and "truebreeding" into account will allow a morph designer access to a lot more shortcuts.
Tough to say. Transhuman morphs have existed in the setting for 30-50 years now, and transgenic mods have been around for 70+ years, so the tech is very mature. Genetically modified plant seeds breed true already today (Monsanto corn is bred by farmers all the time, they just have to pay fees to Monsanto or risk patent suits). My guess is that breeding is perfectly possible, it's just a question of whether these traits are placed in as breedable, or whether people work under the assumption that your first body doesn't have to be your best.
Cifer wrote:
That said, I'd consider it likely that the Ultimates are working on a Remade morph that can naturally breed true (or maybe they don't care about that at all and have abolished reproctive capabilities in their morphs altogether - that probably depends on the specific ultimate's personal philosophy).
My guess is that most morphs breed fine within their own clades. The only real question that arises is how they breed when you mix clades... what do you get when you cross a Remade with a Futura, or an Octomorph with a Neo-Cetacean (if their chromosome count isn't so drastically different that it's impossible).
Transhumans will one day be the Luddites of the posthuman age. [url=http://bit.ly/2p3wk7c]Help me get my gaming fix, if you want.[/url]
Tyrnis Tyrnis's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Decivre wrote:
My guess is that most morphs breed fine within their own clades. The only real question that arises is how they breed when you mix clades... what do you get when you cross a Remade with a Futura, or an Octomorph with a Neo-Cetacean (if their chromosome count isn't so drastically different that it's impossible).
While I think it's a pretty safe bet that cross-species procreation can't happen naturally, I'd be willing to bet that corporations like Somatek offer customized reproductive assistance -- scan the Octomorph, and produce Neo-Cetacean genetic material that carries similar traits, or vice versa.
s45qu4tch s45qu4tch's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
There is a few problems that I've yet seen mentioned. Sorry if I missed them. I've gotten the impression that many morphs have "standard lines". What I mean by that is there are many copies (clones) of an individual in a specific morph type. While it is possible to get a custom splicer, there are many generic mass produced ones from these "standard lines" available. This has been mentioned in the books (don't remember where) that there are habs where everyone is in the same morph. It seems to me that attempting to breed these "standard lines" among themselves would require in-utero modifications to avoid the pitfalls of inbreeding. While this may not seem like a big deal, the human species in EP has just barely avoided extinction (maybe). Having as much genetic diversity as possible would seem like the way to go. What would happen to an exocolony of synths and explorer morphs that gets cut off from its gate, if it doesn't have the tech to prevent this inbreeding issue? Without the advanced medical nanotech the entire colony, and human species in general, could go belly up. Then there's the issue of what's been lost. Many people didn't get off planet, and many that did went without bodies. This represents a massive loss of genetic diversity. These days many people put a great importance on being genetically related to their offspring. (I argue that if this wasn't the case, In Vitro and surrogates would be rare and the would be no need for orphanages.) If this still exists, how can you have a child and feel like it's yours if the child is a Caucasian splicer while the parents are fall evacuees who egocasted from Africa and Asia? Their DNA is lost, or in the claws of the Titans. Never again to be passed on to a new generation. Plus what DNA would be used in an exo-womb if the parents are evacuees in synths? They're not contributing DNA so who gets to decide what DNA goes into the child? Which leads me to the nature versus nurture debate, but I'm not going into that now. Seems to me that it would be best to make it as simple as possible. Make all morphs breed true and create as much genetic diversity in them as possible. As to which parent the child will take after? I suggest taking the Blue Planet approach. That is an RPG (listed as a reference in EP core book) from FFG that is now out of print. In BP they'd sent colonists to this water world. All of them (called Aquaforms) where modified to function on this planet. While generally the same there where two types divided by respiration, Squids which had gills, and Divers which have the respiratory system of marine mammals (collapsible lungs). These two groups were cross-fertile (even with humans, if I remember correctly) and where modified to allow for this. The mother's eggs contained the genetic modifications, while the father's sperm did not. As a result, Aquaform children always take after their mothers irregardless of dad's genotype. Squid mommies had Squid babies, period. So Children take after their mothers morph. OK that's my two bucks. I think I covered everything. Let's see.
We're Anarchists, with a capital 'A'! You know what that means? Do ya? That means that our forefathers were kicked out of every decent country in the solar system!-John Winger "Stripes" (Updated)
Decimator Decimator's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
s45qu4tch wrote:
It seems to me that attempting to breed these "standard lines" among themselves would require in-utero modifications to avoid the pitfalls of inbreeding. While this may not seem like a big deal, the human species in EP has just barely avoided extinction (maybe). Having as much genetic diversity as possible would seem like the way to go.
The thing is, the pitfalls of inbreeding mostly do not apply when both morphs are genefixed. Dangerous recessive genes have all been removed!
s45qu4tch s45qu4tch's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Decimator wrote:
The thing is, the pitfalls of inbreeding mostly do not apply when both morphs are genefixed. Dangerous recessive genes have all been removed!
Evolution dictates that mutations will occur in biological organisms. I doubt genefixing will stop that process without ongoing maintenance. Should transhumanity lose genefixing or lose access to it (the colony scenario I mentioned) there could be serious issues. While EP does mention that morphs are designed to survive in their new space based environments, germline mutations may still find a way to occur. Hence the old "life finds a way" argument.
We're Anarchists, with a capital 'A'! You know what that means? Do ya? That means that our forefathers were kicked out of every decent country in the solar system!-John Winger "Stripes" (Updated)
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
My general assumption has always been that something like a fury is not designed to breed. Its genetic code has never gone through the splitting and recombining that a sperm and an egg have. So there's no reason for them to avoid things that would manifest as genetic diseases in the next generation. So perhaps the gene that creates protein A is linked to a part of the genome that has been specially added. Even assuming it COULD breed conventionally (and I don't believe that to be the case with furies), in two generations of breeding with any other morph model you may have a child who requires protein A to live, but doesn't have the genetic code to produce it. The solution here would be cloning, but that comes with its own dangers. I also wouldn't assume that both halves of the genetic code are identical (I haven't done biology for ages, so bear with me as I stumble through my memories of eighth grade.) Not everything will be BB or bb. It may still be Bb. There's no reason for them to operate otherwise for something like a fury. A splicer is a different situation, since they're modifications of a standard genome created through and for sexual reproduction. But even then, genetic diversity is desirable. We want some people who are fast runners or lateral thinkers, or who have dark or light skin or whatever, and no one is going to have everything. And remember, sicle cell anemia is considered a defect ... until you're exposed to malaria. So I would agree that the common genetic diseases might be extinguished here, the concern of genetic diversity still is genuine.
Elfface Elfface's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
See, what I'm curious about is how it works for infomorphs and synthmorphs. Sure, they can't biologically reproduce, but that's not gonna stop people. Merging forks from different people tends to have nasty results, on a 'full' brain. Merging a pair of delta forks might get you something simple-minded, with lots of room to learn, and some traits from both parents. Raising it quickly through overclocking is a bad idea, but in real-time in a community, you might end up making the second generation of transhumans.
Tyrnis Tyrnis's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Elfface wrote:
See, what I'm curious about is how it works for infomorphs and synthmorphs. Sure, they can't biologically reproduce, but that's not gonna stop people. Merging forks from different people tends to have nasty results, on a 'full' brain. Merging a pair of delta forks might get you something simple-minded, with lots of room to learn, and some traits from both parents. Raising it quickly through overclocking is a bad idea, but in real-time in a community, you might end up making the second generation of transhumans.
A delta fork is more akin to a simple AI than an actual ego -- it wouldn't be suitable for being treated as/becoming a full-fledged transhuman any more than a muse would be. I think a beta fork would be the minimum acceptable for those purposes. At this point in the EP setting, though, it doesn't seem like psychosurgery is advanced enough to produce viable new personalities via fork merging. We've got fringe elements that have pulled off some semblance of that, but they tend to be a little on the crazy side. I'd consider the achievement of non-biological reproduction to be a pretty big step toward posthuman status, personally.
weaver95 weaver95's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Elfface wrote:
See, what I'm curious about is how it works for infomorphs and synthmorphs. Sure, they can't biologically reproduce, but that's not gonna stop people. Merging forks from different people tends to have nasty results, on a 'full' brain. Merging a pair of delta forks might get you something simple-minded, with lots of room to learn, and some traits from both parents. Raising it quickly through overclocking is a bad idea, but in real-time in a community, you might end up making the second generation of transhumans.
Greg Bear discussed this topic in his book 'Eon' (a largely post human society that did some very strange things with causality and paid the price for it). Basically, their transhumanist factions found a way to take what they called 'the mystery' or source code/kernel from two people and synthesize a new consciousness from it - essentially 'birthing' transhumans into a very detailed and hyper-realistic simulation of real life and growing them up from there. Personally I thought the author engaged in more than a bit of hand waveium in most of his novel but the idea of building a new consciousness from the core of two donors is at least worth a mention here.
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
I'm sure the technology will be available ... just not yet. And given the rate that technology is advancing, I imagine that it will be very soon. At 10 AF though, I don't think it's there. Perhaps what you can do is do a complete psychological profile of yourself and your mate(s), determine what are your critical traits, then attempt to reproduce those traits by the careful introduction of hormones and events for the fetus in the exowomb, and at some points in the child's early life (plus a favorable morph). I don't know if you can make an infomorph 'baby'. It would be somewhere between AGI and seed AI, so automatically it's a dangerous proposition. Making a delta fork and turning it into an AGI or something like that just isn't quite there yet either, unfortunately.
D-Miller D-Miller's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
This is an excellent topic; however I have to wonder how often it comes up in game play? How big of an impact on your players is this? I’m not trying to be a troll, but I can’t remember ever having one of my players in any game come up to me and say “Hey, I want to have my character get pregnant.” With EPs technology, unwanted pregnancy (if even possible) shouldn’t be a factor. So my main question is other than a setting thing, is this a major impact on your game? (This question is open to anyone who wants to answer, not just the OP.)
-D
OneTrikPony OneTrikPony's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
D-Miller wrote:
This is an excellent topic; however I have to wonder how often it comes up in game play? How big of an impact on your players is this? I’m not trying to be a troll, but I can’t remember ever having one of my players in any game come up to me and say “Hey, I want to have my character get pregnant.” With EPs technology, unwanted pregnancy (if even possible) shouldn’t be a factor. So my main question is other than a setting thing, is this a major impact on your game? (This question is open to anyone who wants to answer, not just the OP.)
LOL :D :D maybe players don't think about getting pregnant but as a GM I'd like to get my player's characters knocked up every chance I get :D just once I'd like to say the words; "oops! critical fail. You are now a babydady. She decides she's gonna keep it. How would you like to deal with the support payments?"

Mea Culpa: My mode of speech can make others feel uninvited to argue or participate. This is the EXACT opposite of what I intend when I post.

tsedeq tsedeq's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
It's funny, I was actually planning to do a whole campaign arc around this topic, so I've appreciated the discussion. I think Firewall would care deeply if there was a new way for transhumanity to expand its numbers. A failure to reproduce seems like an existential threat. Also, in light of the current problem of gathering enough resources to create morphs for the digitized masses, a natural birthing method would be a great supplemental means to spreading the transhuman presence.
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
This question has some pretty intense and pervasive sociological ramifications. It has a huge impact on the setting itself.
OneTrikPony OneTrikPony's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
tsedeq wrote:
A failure to reproduce seems like an existential threat. Also, in light of the current problem of gathering enough resources to create morphs for the digitized masses, a natural birthing method would be a great supplemental means to spreading the transhuman presence.
Actually I see it from the flip side of the coin. Providing a biomorph for everyone who wants one is only part of the issue. There is no human freindly biosphere in the Sol System any longer. Not anywhere. So it's not just bout growing and giving people Splicers or even Pods. It's the fact that you also have to provide them with all of the infrastructure needed to keep them alive. There aren't that many people in cold storage or simulspace who can produce enough to provide a return on that investment. So, I think that people who make babies while real people are still waiting in line for their "40 acres and a menton" are viewed as selfish asshats.

Mea Culpa: My mode of speech can make others feel uninvited to argue or participate. This is the EXACT opposite of what I intend when I post.

Arenamontanus Arenamontanus's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Incidentally, Io9 had a post about alternative family structures in sf, with some fun possibilities for EP: http://io9.com/5878002/the-most-wonderfully-alternative-families-in-scie... Of course, my favourite is Greg Egan's Diaspora, where children are AGIs generated from random numbers, adopted by passing citizens, and the most important relation is to your teacher.
Extropian
tsedeq tsedeq's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Quote:
So, I think that people who make babies while real people are still waiting in line for their "40 acres and a menton" are viewed as selfish asshats.
I see what you're saying, but I think the real limitation in creating morphs for infugees must be whatever rare materials morphs require, or maybe the production process is just very slow. I haven't read all the source materials yet, maybe something out there explains why it is taking so long to create enough morphs and my previous sentence is complete BS. If there was some parallel biological way to create morphs without relying on rare materials or a lengthy production process, this wouldn't influence the rate at which infomorphs could be retrieved from cold storage. Currently the biggest "selfish asshats" I see are the firewall sentinels who keep resleeving after missions. Also, I think the idea of biological reproduction has interesting possibilities for adventures. Firewall could send a colonizing gatecrashing team with biological reproductive abilities, increasing the chances (however small of an increase, it would still be an increase) of thriving if something unforeseen were to happen to their access to morph technology. Or, the characters could be sent to eliminate a morph but face a moral dilemma when they learn it is somehow pregnant. Or maybe some transhumans are dedicated to biological reproduction for religious reasons and are facing persecution.
OneTrikPony OneTrikPony's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Diaspora was awesome. and Egan should be complimented for being able to describe stuff like standing in a multidimensional space in ways that a luddite like me can visualize and understand. However; You, Mr. Arenamontanus, should be teased for linking to a list of science fiction that includes Twilight and the Power Puff Girls! :b The rarest thing that morphs require is 3 years to grow. As for actual materials there's nothing really that rare that is required in great amounts. [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_of_the_human_body#Elemental_com... If there are a billion people as infomorphs or in cold storage who would like to have a Splicer you'd need: 43 million tons of oxygen 16 milloin tons of carbon 7 million tons of hydrogen 1.8 million tons of nitrogen 1 million tons of calcium and 70 thousand tons of trace elements that are not that hard to find on Mars, Venus or Luna. Compare that to the 150 billion tons of refined materials you'd need to build habitat for those people that has no better amenities or more space per person than the [ur=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Space_Station]ISS[/url] and you'll see what I'm saying about infrastructure. With a growth time of 18 years, making babies and raising children is no better than a hobby or religion for the rich. That's why Fundamentalist types are brinkers. EP society doesn't have room or use for that kind of thing.

Mea Culpa: My mode of speech can make others feel uninvited to argue or participate. This is the EXACT opposite of what I intend when I post.

Arenamontanus Arenamontanus's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
OneTrikPony wrote:
However; You, Mr. Arenamontanus, should be teased for linking to a list of science fiction that includes Twilight and the Power Puff Girls! :b
I am secure in my adulthood and masculinity. :-) BTW, continuing the io9 sourcing, here is an anti-adorable robot baby: http://io9.com/5878154/this-robotic-baby-crawled-out-of-your-nightmares I think this kind of thing is the explanation why people actually want morphs that take 3 years to grow and look down/fear pods. Because underneath that flesh there is a little clawed robomonstrosity...
Extropian
Michael Crichton Michael Crichton's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
s45qu4tch wrote:
how can you have a child and feel like it's yours if the child is a Caucasian splicer while the parents are fall evacuees who egocasted from Africa and Asia?
Even without a sample of the egos' in question DNA, as long as a picture (or better yet, biometric measurements) is available, it should be trivially easy to make a zygote that _looks_ like a combination of the original genotypes. For most people, that should be enough.
Quote:
Seems to me that it would be best to make it as simple as possible. Make all morphs breed true and create as much genetic diversity in them as possible.
That's probably best from the standpoint of species survival, but not what's best for the bottom lines of the various corporations that design most of the morphs.
nezumi.hebereke wrote:
Not everything will be BB or bb. It may still be Bb. There's no reason for them to operate otherwise for something like a fury.
And in fact, from a copyright standpoint, the corporate designers have a very good reason to have as many heterozygous traits as possible, to prevent their proprietary morphs from being 'pirated' via sexual reproduction.
Decivre Decivre's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Michael Crichton wrote:
And in fact, from a copyright standpoint, the corporate designers have a very good reason to have as many heterozygous traits as possible, to prevent their proprietary morphs from being 'pirated' via sexual reproduction.
Assuming they haven't simply found a way for the morph in question to produce zygotes with completely different genetics from the rest of the body. This to me would be the easiest means to prevent "sexual piracy". Ah, sexual piracy. The only type of piracy that people are enthusiastic about trying.
OneTrikPony wrote:
However; You, Mr. Arenamontanus, should be teased for linking to a list of science fiction that includes Twilight and the Power Puff Girls! :b
You got something to say about the Powerpuff Girls? :P
Transhumans will one day be the Luddites of the posthuman age. [url=http://bit.ly/2p3wk7c]Help me get my gaming fix, if you want.[/url]
King Shere King Shere's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
I think there is a risk of having stillborns if the morphs became "fertile", the genetics information included might only be for a headless body. it easier to ego swap bodies if their brain has a universal standard, so the ego case/brain might be a separate entity, and grown "separately" (perhaps only from a genetic viewpoint).
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
I was thinking about this the other day and wondering, if you control the exowomb, how much utility is there in modifying the genetic code for a custom biomorph anyway? If you're growing a fury, sure you'll start with a splicer base, since the work has already been done. But then, if you're trying to encourage muscle growth, or female characteristics or whatnot, you can either figure out what hormone is required, what portion of the DNA affects production of that hormone, what the other side effects of messing with that segment of the DNA are, modify the DNA, test the DNA, then push it out; OR you can just inject those hormones directly into the exowomb. The idea of modifying the genetics of the morph seems analogous to modifying the genetics of a woman as a form of birth control. Even if it's effective, it's just not as cheap as taking a pill.
Arenamontanus Arenamontanus's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Michael Crichton wrote:
Even without a sample of the egos' in question DNA, as long as a picture (or better yet, biometric measurements) is available, it should be trivially easy to make a zygote that _looks_ like a combination of the original genotypes. For most people, that should be enough.
Many people would still likely say it is not *their* flesh and blood. People are funny that way. Actually, this suggests an interesting character or subplot: a couple who deeply desires having a baby together, but their original ("real" as they see it) DNA got lost in the Fall. They had to sleeve in other morphs and the genome databases got corrupted. So now they are unhappily considering their options, not liking any of them. To turn it into an adventure: they get wind of where a backup of the database might have ended up. Unfortunately it is in absolutely the wrong place: it was a government server that ended up in the Jovian Republic. Now they want to hire the PCs to get the genomes.
Extropian
King Shere King Shere's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Arenamontanus wrote:
To turn it into an adventure: they get wind of where a backup of the database might have ended up. Unfortunately it is in absolutely the wrong place: it was a government server that ended up in the Jovian Republic. Now they want to hire the PCs to get the genomes.
A plot twist could then be that the desired sample of genome is already being (or has been) used to create a child.
OneTrikPony OneTrikPony's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
nezumi.hebereke wrote:
I was thinking about this the other day and wondering, if you control the exowomb, how much utility is there in modifying the genetic code for a custom biomorph anyway? If you're growing a fury, sure you'll start with a splicer base, since the work has already been done. But then, if you're trying to encourage muscle growth, or female characteristics or whatnot, you can either figure out what hormone is required, what portion of the DNA affects production of that hormone, what the other side effects of messing with that segment of the DNA are, modify the DNA, test the DNA, then push it out; OR you can just inject those hormones directly into the exowomb.
It's unlikely that you can make a fury, remade, menton, even a ruster, or any of the top end morphs by simply altering the natal environment. Certainly the natal environment must be tailored to which ever sub-genus it's carrying but it's a huge stretch to think you can start with basic human stock and end up with something like a Ruster without genetic modification. Take the Fury's durability as example; The fury has durability on par with mechanical systems. This must mean that it's tissues are made of some very exotic biology. The basic human layout and design aren't adequate either it would have a cardiovascular system optimized and highly resistant to things like hydrostatic shock, it would have a brain case that does a better job of cushioning and protecting the brain from TBE causing trauma's, Bones, joints ligaments and tendons would be much much stronger and more flexible with more advantageous attachments. Of course all the ancillary systems like the Endocrine and digestive system would be modified to support this extreme and enhanced biological chemistry. The Ruster is an even more outlandish example. Rusters can survive by breathing in an atmosphere that can't be more than 10% oxygen even at atmospheric pressures less than 5% of the pressure at the top of Everest! That's not even the amazing part. Rusters can breath an atmosphere that's at least 70% carbon dioxide. That chemistry is nowhere near human. There is simply no possible way to make a Ruster just by altering the natal environment of a splicer. The truth is, in Eclipse Phase, most morphs really are allready Post-Human.

Mea Culpa: My mode of speech can make others feel uninvited to argue or participate. This is the EXACT opposite of what I intend when I post.

Prior Prior's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Not sure if this has already been covered, but would a 'naturally born' body / morph be worth any more on the open market than a vat grown one?
"I do seem to remember a process where you people ask me questions and I give you answers, and then I ask you questions and you give me answers, and that's the way we find out things. I think I read that in a manual somewhere."
OneTrikPony OneTrikPony's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Prior wrote:
Not sure if this has already been covered, but would a 'naturally born' body / morph be worth any more on the open market than a vat grown one?
Actually; I'm GMing an adventure right now that is partly based on this concept. The character's are involved in an effort to liberate a girl (a flat) who is about to be sacrificed in a show of Reclaimer performance art. My thinking is that if a trinket like a coin or item of clothing from earth can be worth so much, it follows that a flat, born on earth, (especially if they're attractive and young) would have huge emotional value to many factions in 10AF. There are other factors that would increase the value of flats too; They're rare, and becoming more so. They have unlicensed genetics and also unrestricted reproductive ability. They probably have genuine ethnicity. On the other hand- They're flats. Most people who are used to better morphs wouldn't have that much fun wearing a flat as their "Daily Driver". In contemporary terms; I'd love to restore a 52 ford pickup but I'd never do anything with it cause I've become fond of power breaks, power steering, and four-wheel-drive.

Mea Culpa: My mode of speech can make others feel uninvited to argue or participate. This is the EXACT opposite of what I intend when I post.

Prior Prior's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
But as you point out, to an eccentric collector, a 'flat' would potentially have a very high value. I guess the same could be said for animals that were saved from the Fall. It all reminds me of Bladerunner... ... now there's an idea!!
"I do seem to remember a process where you people ask me questions and I give you answers, and then I ask you questions and you give me answers, and that's the way we find out things. I think I read that in a manual somewhere."
Arenamontanus Arenamontanus's picture
Re: The (transhunan) birds & the bees
Prior wrote:
It all reminds me of Bladerunner...
"Do you like my baby?" "It's artificial?" "Of course it is." "Must be expensive." "Very."
Extropian