Apple's Siri a intelligent personal assistant
http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/siri-faq.html
—
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/tc_userbar.jpg[/img]
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/exh_userbar.jpg[/img]
[img]http://boxall.no-ip.org/img/argo_userbar.jpg[/img]
[i]"To find fault is easy; to do better may be difficult."[/i]
Plutarch
root@Real world Muse
[hr] I'm going to have to agree with 750 on this one. One of the taglines of the company I work for is "Making Computers Hear", which is a right bitch and a half. NaturallySpeaking by Dragon has been around for awhile, but it has not yet been able to handle declination and the verbal signals or end-of-sentence. Siri is much better about that, but we still have a long ways to go. Don't get me wrong, I want to see this succeed. If someone manages to get a good natural language processor working and wants to develop a personal assistant, having a background in cog psych, signal processing, and computer science gives me a shot (if a fairly small one. curse all of you massively qualified and competent people!) at working on projects intended to give the personal assistant the ability to engage in emotional relationships with users.@-rep +1
|c-rep +1
|g-rep +1
|r-rep +1
]root@Real world Muse
[hr] Aaaaaand done. And now I need to learn Ruby. Bleh.@-rep +1
|c-rep +1
|g-rep +1
|r-rep +1
]root@Real world Muse
[hr] Eh. I find that privacy paranoia can be tamed by assuming that everything placed on the internet can be correlated with you in real life unless you are taking extreme measures. There is this psych theory about how people present themselves when in public and private, the whole "the world is a stage" thing; online is just another place where you are on stage. And now to screw over my chances to run for office: I like bad things!@-rep +1
|c-rep +1
|g-rep +1
|r-rep +1
]