Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

Too fluffy to have a bonus ?

3 posts / 0 new

Last post

Mon, 2011-10-10 10:43

#1

fafromnice fafromnice's picture

fafromnice's picture

Too fluffy to have a bonus ?

I was cheking the Chickcharnie pod in panopticon in the description it says that it is one meter tall, like the hypergibbons pod the hypergibbons have a -10 in combat because it count like a small target does someone know why the Chickcharnie dosen't have the same bonus ?

—

What do you mean a butterfly cause this ? How a butterfly can cause an enviromental system overload on the other side of a 10 000 egos habitat ?

Mon, 2011-10-10 22:22

#2

LostProxy

LostProxy's picture

Re: Too fluffy to have a bonus ?

It says over a meter while the Hypergibbon is just one meter. I guess there is that little difference.

Mon, 2011-10-10 23:10

#3

Tyrnis

Tyrnis's picture

Re: Too fluffy to have a bonus ?

There are a few little things like that. Neotenics get the bonus for being a small target, while Neo-avians, who are also described as being up to the size of a human child, do not, nor do they get prehensile feet, though their morph description suggests they have them. Some are doubtless intentional, others likely just weren't something the writers thought about. I think in this case, it's probably a matter of the chickcharnie being big enough not to get the bonus while still being smaller than an average transhuman. If you think they should have it, give it to them and increase the cost of the morph accordingly. It's even easier to do things like that now that we have rules for morph creation in the latest issue of The Eye.