Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

Open Source Piracy

14 posts / 0 new
Last post
root root's picture
Open Source Piracy
root@Yar! Here be the Lulzboat. An interesting potential service a hypercorp could render to another hypercorp: Lowest Bidder Protection Racket. Each hypercorp maintains a contract with a chosen Grey Hat crew. For a nominal fee, this Grey Hat crew puts your computer resources on a list of networks that the Grey Hats regularly attempt to hack into. Since this is a business arrangement, there is the implicit understanding that any embarrassing secrets would be strictly confidential, but that the client would be mocked openly for their shameful and lax information security. While the act of exposing such lulzy secrets would naturally alert interested Black Hat crews, it would still take those Black Hats some time to rope in the exposed network for zombie-botnet resources, as they don't necessarily know anything about what the declared weakness is. After a contractually specified period of time, the Grey Hats would drop the data as to what the weaknesses are to their Black Hat brethren. May the best boat of pirates win. Naturally, any good Grey Hat crew wants to have a large list of clients, so its best to not piss them off too much. You want to give your White Hat siblings a chance to defend themselves, or the game won't be lulzy enough, and you need the lulz to attract the predator Black Hats. And if the Black Hats don't come, the White Hats don't pay enough for Grey Hat contracts. After all, if the client valued their continued existence as a company, they would be willing to pay for a higher premium account on the Protection Racket that come with a statistically significantly lower incidence of adverse network occurrences, right?
[ @-rep +1 | c-rep +1 | g-rep +1 | r-rep +1 ]
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
I'm missing why a given hypercorp would pay a grey hat group at the risk of public mocking, rather than a white hat group at the risk of ... not. Is it meant as a form of payment, since the grey hat gets to boast that he cracked this system, while the white hat can only boast that he worked for X corp?
root root's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
root@Open Source Piracy [hr]
nezumi.hebereke wrote:
I'm missing why a given hypercorp would pay a grey hat group at the risk of public mocking, rather than a white hat group at the risk of ... not. Is it meant as a form of payment, since the grey hat gets to boast that he cracked this system, while the white hat can only boast that he worked for X corp?
The given hypercorp wouldn't want to pay the grey hats; this is pure extortion. The security problem the hypercorps face is that their systems have to be protected against every intrusion threat while the blackhat only has to find one vulnerability to exploit. The idea of having a greyhat protection racket is that they are doing what the blackhats do, namely breaking into your base and killin ur d00dz, and showing the hypercorp the holes the hypercorps' whitehats forgot about or didn't know about (or things that they did know about but the client ignored). The difference is that they aren't damaging your company's precious data while they do it, or making off with said data for their own nefarious uses. Unless, that is, you don't pay them their protection fee.
[ @-rep +1 | c-rep +1 | g-rep +1 | r-rep +1 ]
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
That is not uncommon right now. In fact, one of the most common hacking rackets is to say 'we have your data and we will not expose it in exchange for cash'. After all, asking for a lump sum of $X00,000 is a lot more secure and pays a lot better than trying to market that data (without getting caught). It seems like the changes you're suggesting are, they lower the stakes (less ransom, but less data revealed), and if you pay up they tell you what the vulnerability is. Regardless, they are definitely NOT grey hat at that point.
root root's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
root@Open Source Piracy [hr] Well, if they aren't grey hats they certainly aren't black hats. Or at least, they aren't the really bad black hats that crack your system, root your boxes, and dump your data to the highest bidder. And aren't shades of black just darker shades of grey? I'm trying to contrast LulzSec against the more organized crime elements engaging in the same behavior. I would say that simple extortion is much kinder than the alternatives.
[ @-rep +1 | c-rep +1 | g-rep +1 | r-rep +1 ]
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
It is much kinder, but generally it's also much more economically sensible. If you crack Pepsi's servers, the information on there is really only going to be valuable to one or two other entities (namely, Coca Cola). But selling to them is tough; you have to convince them you have this data without showing it, convince them it's of value (and of as much value as you say it is), convince them to play dirty rather than turn to Pepsi and just say 'hey, we don't support this behavior, let's work together to catch these crooks', and hope that Coke is in a place where they can actually use that data. If any of that falls through, all your work is for nothing. Plus of course, once you sell that data, you can't sell it again. Compare that to the other situation of threatening Pepsi. You don't need to convince them as much that you have valuable data, because their fear is going to be greater than their greed and just a little bit of throw-away information can suggest much worse. You don't need to keep from showing it either. You don't need to convince them to play dirty. You don't need to hope Coke can leverage the data or will play dirty because Pepsi doesn't know either. The Coke exec involved stands to make a bonus, but the Pepsi exec stands to lose his job. In fact, the bonus to Coke from the additional data has less economic value than the penalty to Pepsi (since they suffer the loss of sales PLUS the loss of investor faith). Plus, the trick is repeatable indefinitely. Playing against multiple corps, say you have Ford data you're trying to sell to Honda, Toyota, GM and Hyundai, still makes things more complex and generally the value of the data goes down the more people you're sharing it amongst. So it's tough. Plus of course, the risk of capture goes up as well. Only rarely does it make more economic sense to make the first offer to the competitor rather than to blackmail the loser. If you want to make your group special, I'd try to think outside of the economic mold. If they're doing it for lulz, why are they asking for money at all? Why can't they swap it for favors, and pull those favors to do dirty stuff against other parties? Or perhaps they really do just hack systems and play practical jokes (for instance, changing Pepsi's site to say it's made with swamp water). That's not very common in our modern society because the cost of cracking a system and keeping it cracked for any amount of time is high, and the profit is usually low. But in a reputation economy, someone who can keep some web defacements up for a month or two are looking at some MAJOR rep boosts, and that translates to wealth.
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
By the by, the actual LulzSec doesn't charge any fees or withhold any information. The reason they are 'greyhat' is because they don't use what they discover for profit or substantial destruction, just to cause inconvenience.
The Demon Code The Demon Code's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
Quote:
Each hypercorp maintains a contract with a chosen Grey Hat crew. For a nominal fee, this Grey Hat crew puts your computer resources on a list of networks that the Grey Hats regularly attempt to hack into. Since this is a business arrangement, there is the implicit understanding that any embarrassing secrets would be strictly confidential, but that the client would be mocked openly for their shameful and lax information security.
If I remember correctly, the movie 'Sneakers' had the protagonists doing something similar except they did one job at a time and didn't do the pointing and laughing. I think the term for it is a "Tiger Team".
nezumi.hebereke nezumi.hebereke's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
Yeah, it's not uncommon to hire white hat 'red teams' to test your systems by attempting to break them, but everything is handled with all sorts of paperwork describing what is permissible, and everything is kept purely confidential.
Rallan Rallan's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
root wrote:
The given hypercorp wouldn't want to pay the grey hats; this is pure extortion.
Um... no. These guys break up strikes by rewiring the brains of trade unionists. The settle mineral rights disputes by sending in mercenaries with more firepower than a panzer division. You're basically trying to run an extortion racket on Keyser Söze here.
root root's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
root@Open Source Piracy [hr]
Rallan wrote:
root wrote:
The given hypercorp wouldn't want to pay the grey hats; this is pure extortion.
Um... no. These guys break up strikes by rewiring the brains of trade unionists. The settle mineral rights disputes by sending in mercenaries with more firepower than a panzer division. You're basically trying to run an extortion racket on Keyser Söze here.
So they are not extortionists, but rather the brave workers that throw their bodies upon the machines of the mercurial dictator in protest? I haven't decided if I buy that yet. There is a peculiar flavor to this current international psychodrama between autistic hackers, and I'm not sure if it tastes good yet. If these are hacker hypercorps vying for contracts in the nuevo-intel community because their news filters yielded the phrase "cyberwar" a few weeks ago after *someone* hacked the Big Goog, then I may give a polite golf clap and go on my merry way. If this instead is a few people seeing if they can hide behind a Doktor Sleepless trope in the shape of Robin Hood while they go Project Mayhem all over the place, I may have to give them five out of five stars. If they really did it just for the lulz, then I express my disappointment at them wasting an exquisite moment in the spotlight.
[ @-rep +1 | c-rep +1 | g-rep +1 | r-rep +1 ]
root root's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
root@Unimpressed [hr] Great. Lulzsec is getting exposed and one of them lives within a hundred miles of me, where she is making my state look bad. Apparently this one is happy to rat out the others to save her own ass, and thinks that this means she is "playing" the feds. I am so very thoroughly unimpressed. I was very much hoping this wasn't just the cyber equivalent of spray-painting city hall and claiming to have "stuck it to the Man, man", and that there was some sort of grander agenda going on. On the plus side, it appears there may be a systems administrator position opening up somewhere nearby. I'll have to get a resume ready.
[ @-rep +1 | c-rep +1 | g-rep +1 | r-rep +1 ]
Re-Laborat Re-Laborat's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
The Demon Code wrote:
If I remember correctly, the movie 'Sneakers' had the protagonists doing something similar except they did one job at a time and didn't do the pointing and laughing. I think the term for it is a "Tiger Team".
That is one correct term, yes. The term for running someone else's security deliberately to expose a weakness as part of an agreement with them to secure their network is called 'penetration testing'. The term for running someone else's security deliberately to expose a weakness in order to blackmail them into paying you is called 'a federal offense punishable by fines and jail time'.
The Doctor The Doctor's picture
Re: Open Source Piracy
nezumi.hebereke wrote:
By the by, the actual LulzSec doesn't charge any fees or withhold any information.
That is not entirely accurate. When LulzSec was still in operation, they were soliciting and accepting donations of Bitcoins (presumably to cash out after laundering them through a dozen dummy accounts or so). When dining on [url=http://whatever.scalzi.com/2006/09/26/how-to-make-a-schadenfreude-pie/]s... pie[/url], tips are apparently accepted.